Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38541126›Full record

ReviewMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2024

Current Perspectives in Giant Cell Arteritis: Can We Better Connect Pathogenesis and Treatment?

Daniela Opriș-Belinski, Claudia Oana Cobilinschi, Ioana Săulescu

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniela Opriș-BelinskiDepartment of Rheumatology and Internal Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-3883-9672
Claudia Oana CobilinschiDepartment of Rheumatology and Internal Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.
Ioana SăulescuDepartment of Rheumatology and Internal Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.
Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is a large-vessel vasculitis affecting elderly patients and targeting the aorta and its main branches, leading to cranial and extracranial manifestations. The mechanism behind the ischemia is a granulomatous-type inflammation with potentially critical lesions, including visual loss involving the ophthalmic artery. Despite significant progress in unraveling the pathophysiology of this disease, treatment options still rely on glucocorticoids (GCs) to overcome active vascular lesions and disease flares. However, uncertainty still revolves around the optimal dose and tapering rhythm. Few corticosteroid-sparing agents have proven useful in GCA, namely, methotrexate and tocilizumab, benefiting cumulative GC dose and relapse-free intervals. The future looks promising with regard to using other agents like abatacept and Janus-kinase inhibitors or blocking the granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor receptor.

Indexed as

Giant Cell ArteritisAgedAortaGlucocorticoidsHumansMethotrexateGlucocorticoidsMethotrexategiant cell arteritisglucocorticoidslarge-vessel vasculitisnovel drugspathogenic pathways

Identifiers

PMID38541126
PMCPMC10972181
OpenAlexW4392169797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.