Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38541036›Full record

ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2024

Exceptional Cases Demand Exceptional Personalized Solutions: The Next Level in Dental Rehabilitation.

Nils-Claudius Gellrich, Philippe Korn, Philipp Jehn, Michael Neuhaus, Fritjof Lentge, Björn Rahlf

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nils-Claudius GellrichDepartment of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, D-30625 Hannover, Germany.
Philippe KornDepartment of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, D-30625 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4586-6970
Philipp JehnDepartment of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, D-30625 Hannover, Germany.
Michael NeuhausDepartment of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, D-30625 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3461-5364
Fritjof LentgeDepartment of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, D-30625 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9871-8421
Björn RahlfDepartment of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, D-30625 Hannover, Germany.
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Defects and bone loss in the maxilla and mandible pose significant challenges for dental rehabilitation. This paper focuses on complex cases of bimaxillary dental rehabilitation, where traditional dental implant protocols were not feasible in at least one jaw. Four patients were examined conceptually, where conventional dental implant placement (n = 20) was combined in either the same or opposite jaw with a patient-specific subperiosteal implant (n = 5). This study evaluates aspects such as primary stability, prosthodontic restoration, complications, and soft tissue management over the observation period. None of the five patient-specific subperiosteal implants (IPS Implants

Indexed as

CAD/CAMcomplex dental rehabilitationcomputer-assisted planningdigital workflowIPS implants® preprostheticpatient-specific subperiosteal implantrigid fixationselective laser melting

Identifiers

PMID38541036
PMCPMC10971234
OpenAlexW4392646587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.