Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38540968›Full record

ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2024

The Omics Complexity in Sepsis: The Limits of the Personalized Medicine Approach.

Sebastian Isac, Teodora Isac, Maria Daniela Tanasescu, Bogdan Pavel, Cristina Veronica Andreescu, Andrada-Georgiana Badea, Damiana Ojog, Geani-Danut Teodorescu, Anca Laceanu, Cristian-Bogdan Trifan and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sebastian IsacDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-2687-2611
Teodora IsacDepartment of Internal Medicine II, Faculty of Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.
Maria Daniela TanasescuDepartment of Medical Semiology, Discipline of Internal Medicine I and Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.
Bogdan PavelDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.
Cristina Veronica AndreescuDepartment of Modern Languages, Faculty of Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.
Andrada-Georgiana BadeaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care I, Fundeni Clinical Institute, 022328 Bucharest, Romania.
Damiana OjogDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care I, Fundeni Clinical Institute, 022328 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0009-0004-8195-3651
Geani-Danut TeodorescuDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care I, Fundeni Clinical Institute, 022328 Bucharest, Romania.
Anca LaceanuDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care I, Fundeni Clinical Institute, 022328 Bucharest, Romania.
Cristian-Bogdan TrifanDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care I, Fundeni Clinical Institute, 022328 Bucharest, Romania.
Gabriela DrocDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care I, Fundeni Clinical Institute, 022328 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-1042-753X
Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy · ROInstitutul Clinic Fundeni · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sepsis is one of the most common causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Despite the remarkable advances in modern medicine throughout the last century, the mortality rates associated with sepsis have remained significantly elevated, both in high- and low-income countries. The main difficulty in the diagnosis and treatment of septic patients is the tremendous heterogeneity of this condition. The vast heterogeneity that characterizes sepsis ranges from the clinical presentation to the biological aspects of the disease. Evidence-based medicine approaches sepsis as a homogenous syndrome and does not consider the individual discrepancies between septic patients. This approach may contribute to the poor outcomes of septic patients. In recent years, personalized medicine has gained significant interest. This novel form of medicine underlines the importance of understanding the genetic, epigenetic, and molecular basis of a disease in order to provide a more tailored approach for the patient. The study of "omics", such as cytomics, genomics, epigenomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics, provides a deeper comprehension of the complex interactions between the host, the disease, and the environment. The aim of this review is to summarize the potential role of a personalized approach in sepsis management, considering the interactions between various "omics".

Indexed as

clinical phenotypescytomicsepigenomicsgenomicsmetabolomicsproteomicssepsisseptic shocktranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID38540968
PMCPMC10971110
OpenAlexW4391982798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.