ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Rapid Review on the Concept of Positive Health and Its Implementation in Practice.
Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Salutogenic Principles in Workplace Health Promotion Interventions: A Scoping Review.Journal of prevention (2022) · 2026Article
- Associations of Environmental Modifications and Collaborative Care Environments with Positive Health in Families of Children with Medical Complexity: A Secondary Analysis.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026Article
- A longitudinal psychometric evaluation of a context-sensitive positive health questionnaire for measuring broad health in Dutch adults.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2026Article
- Disability Community Perspectives on Participation in Research and Studying Positive Health.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Making sense of PROM outcomes: a mixed method study to optimize graphical visualization formats for children.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- [The Context-Sensitive Positive Health Questionnaire (CPHQTSG : tijdschrift voor gezondheidswetenschappen · 2026Article
- Article
- Stakeholder and end-user perspectives to refine the Context-sensitive Positive Health Questionnaire (CPHQ) to measure broad health.PloS one · 2026Article
- Article
- Implementing the My Positive Health dialogue tool for children with a chronic condition: barriers and facilitators.BMC pediatrics · 2025Article
- Response to Comments on "Designing a Positive Health Dialogue Tool for Adolescents and Young Adults: A Mixed Methods Study".Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025Article
- Frameworks used to evaluate community-based rehabilitation interventions: A scoping review.African journal of disability · 2025Review
- Exploring Positive Health in Cardiac Patients: Personal Goals and Key Factors for Achieving Improved Well-Being.Journal of patient experience · 2025Article
- The broad positive health perspective on health as common ground for tackling current and future interdisciplinary health challenges.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Designing a Positive Health Dialogue Tool for Adolescents and Young Adults: A Mixed Methods Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024Article
- Towards an integrative approach of healthcare: implementing positive health in three cases in the Netherlands.BMC health services research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Positive health (PH) has been described as a promising transformative innovation to address the challenges of promoting well-being and reducing the burden of disease. For this study, we conducted a scientific literature review of the current state of knowledge about PH as introduced by Huber and colleagues, following the Cochrane Rapid Review recommendations. Three databases were searched (PubMed, Google Scholar, and CINAHL). Data were extracted and synthesised using a narrative approach. A total of 55 articles were included. The initial evaluation revealed promising results at both the individual and collective levels. However, several articles gave reason for further refinement of the conceptualisation of PH and of ways to measure the effects of PH interventions in greater detail. Professionals also expressed a desire for a more informed application and elaboration of the PH method, in various settings and populations, to increase its effectiveness in practice. The results from the rapid review highlight the transformative potential of PH in shifting from a disease-oriented to a health-oriented paradigm of healthcare. This underlines the need for continued research regarding further development of the concept and its practical method, along with the necessity for methodological innovation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.