ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Psychometric Evaluation of the German Version of the Perceived Access to Healthcare Questionnaire in a Sample of Individuals with Rare Chronic Diseases.
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring network relations between healthcare access and utilisation in individuals with rare diseases.Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Arabic Version of the Perceived Access to Health Care Questionnaire: Validation, Factor Analysis, and Rasch Modeling.Health services insights · 2025Article
- Lower Healthcare Access and Its Association With Individual Factors and Health-Related Quality of Life in Adults With Rare Diseases in Switzerland.International journal of public health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Access to healthcare is multifaceted and poses significant challenges for individuals with chronic and rare diseases (RDs). This study aimed to conduct a psychometric evaluation of the German version of the Perception of Access to Healthcare Questionnaire (PAHQ) among individuals with RDs. We conducted an evaluation of the PAHQ using a sample of 271 adults with an RD diagnosis. The 31-item instrument underwent evaluation including a comparison of three different confirmatory factor models (CFA). Subsequent steps involved item removal, reliability analysis (computation of Cronbach's alpha), and analysis of criterion-related validity. The six-factor model showed the best fit to the data and was selected for further examination. Subsequently, six items were removed. Fit indices for the final model were acceptable. Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.75 to 0.91 for the six subscales, except for the availability subscale which exhibited the lowest value (0.64). In terms of criterion-related validity, different skills relating to the navigation of access dimensions were significantly correlated with corresponding PAHQ subscales, thus confirming validity. The capacity of the PAHQ to guide targeted interventions and facilitate cross-population comparisons positions it as a valuable instrument for advancing healthcare access research and promoting equitable access to care, particularly for individuals with rare and chronic diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.