Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38540592›Full record

ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Factors and Processes Facilitating Recovery from Coercion in Mental Health Services-A Meta-Ethnography.

Lene Lauge Berring, Eugenie Georgaca, Sophie Hirsch, Hülya Bilgin, Burcu Kömürcü Akik, Merve Aydin, Evi Verbeke, Gian Maria Galeazzi, Stijn Vanheule, Davide Bertani

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.

Lene Lauge BerringPsychiatric Research Unit, Psychiatry Region Zealand, 4200 Slagelse, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-0529-8980
Eugenie GeorgacaSchool of Psychology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-5904-2534
Sophie HirschDepartment for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy I, Faculty of Medicine, Ulm University, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Hülya BilginMental Health and Psychiatric Nursing Florence Nightingale Nursing Faculty, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, 34000 Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-7332-5568
Burcu Kömürcü AkikDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Languages and History-Geography, Ankara University, 06100 Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-6051-4941
Merve AydinMental Health and Psychiatric Nursing Department, Karadeniz Technical University, 61080 Trabzon, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-7466-2136
Evi VerbekeDepartment of Psychoanalysis and Clinical Consulting, University of Ghent, 9000 Gent, Belgium.
Gian Maria GaleazziDepartment of Biomedical, Metabolic, and Neural Science, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124 Modena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2706-3362
Stijn VanheuleDepartment of Psychoanalysis and Clinical Consulting, University of Ghent, 9000 Gent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-8580-5809
Davide BertaniDepartment of Biomedical, Metabolic, and Neural Science, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124 Modena, Italy.
Ghent University · BEUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia · ITAnkara University · TRAristotle University of Thessaloniki · GRIstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa · TRKaradeniz Technical University · TRUniversität Ulm · DEUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBeing subjected to or witnessing coercive measures in mental health services can have a negative impact on service users, carers and professionals, as they most often are experienced as dehumanising and traumatic. Coercion should be avoided, but when it does happen, it is important to understand how the experience can be processed so that its consequences are managed.

methodA systematic review and meta-ethnography was used to synthesise findings from qualitative studies that examined service users', staff's and relatives' experiences of recovery from being exposed to coercive measures in mental health care settings. We identified, extracted and synthesised, across 23 studies, the processes and factors that were interpreted as significant to process the experience.

resultsRecovery from coercion is dependent on a complex set of conditions that support a sense of dignity and respect, a feeling of safety and empowerment. Being in a facilitating environment, receiving appropriate information and having consistent reciprocal communication with staff are the means through which these conditions can be achieved. People employ strategies to achieve recovery, both during and after coercion, to minimise its impact and process the experience.

conclusionsThe findings point to the importance of mental health care settings offering recovery-oriented environments and mental health professionals employing recovery-oriented practices, that would empower service users to develop strategies for managing their mental distress as well as their experiences in mental health care in a way that minimises traumatisation and fosters recovery.

Indexed as

coerciondebriefinglegal rightsmental healthmeta-ethnographyrecovery

Identifiers

PMID38540592
PMCPMC10970616
OpenAlexW4392658548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.