ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Factors Facilitating and Inhibiting the Implementation of Telerehabilitation-A Scoping Review.
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- The State of the Art of Telemedicine Implementation Architecture: Rapid Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Telerehabilitation for Motor Recovery in Adults with Neurological Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Across Motor Domains, Delivery Models, and Follow-Up Effects.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Exploring Rehabilitation Professionals' Attitudes Toward Telerehabilitation Using Developing a New Questionnaire: A Cross -Sectional Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Iterative Development and Usability Evaluation of an Open-Source Rehabilitation Follow-Up Platform: User-Centered Development Study.JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies · 2026Article
- Effects of Exercise-Based Telerehabilitation Programs on Functional Recovery and Related Outcomes After Stroke: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Observational
- Investigating the Acceptance and Implementation Conditions of Telerehabilitation in Germany Among Patients and Health Care Professionals: Qualitative Interview Study.JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies · 2025Article
- Knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding telerehabilitation among Tunisian physical therapists.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Pulmonary Telerehabilitation in COPD Patients: A Systematic Review to Analyse Patients' Adherence.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Respiratory telerehabilitation: user experience and satisfaction with the program.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Establishment of emerging practices and research priorities for telerehabilitation in solid organ transplantation: meeting report and narrative literature review.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2025Article
- Self-determination Theory as a Lens to Explore the Implementation Challenges of Telehealth.International journal of telerehabilitation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Due to the coronavirus pandemic, telerehabilitation has become increasingly important worldwide. While the effectiveness of telerehabilitation is considered proven for many indications, there is comparatively little knowledge about the implementation conditions. Therefore, this scoping review summarises the current state of facilitating and inhibiting factors that may influence the uptake of telerehabilitation. The review follows the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. The article search was carried out in five databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane and Psyndex) in May 2022, with an update in October 2023. Two independent researchers identified relevant studies according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research served as the theoretical basis for the categorisation of the facilitating and inhibiting criteria in the organisational context. A total of 28 studies (timespan 2012 to 2023) have been included. The most relevant barriers identified are technical issues and a lack of technical skills. The factors considered most favourable for implementation are patients' motivation and the involvement of high-level leaders. The results provide clear indications of factors that inhibit and facilitate implementation, but also show that further research is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.