Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38540566›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Perceptions of Quality of Interprofessional Collaboration, Staff Well-Being and Nonbeneficial Treatment: A Comparison between Nurses and Physicians in Intensive and Palliative Care.

Daniel Schwarzkopf, Frank Bloos, Winfried Meißner, Hendrik Rüddel, Daniel O Thomas-Rüddel, Ulrich Wedding

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniel SchwarzkopfCenter for Sepsis Control and Care, Jena University Hospital, 07747 Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1568-8202
Frank BloosCenter for Sepsis Control and Care, Jena University Hospital, 07747 Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0767-7941
Winfried MeißnerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Jena University Hospital, 07747 Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2982-7696
Hendrik RüddelCenter for Sepsis Control and Care, Jena University Hospital, 07747 Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1067-8988
Daniel O Thomas-RüddelCenter for Sepsis Control and Care, Jena University Hospital, 07747 Jena, Germany.
Ulrich WeddingDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Jena University Hospital, 07747 Jena, Germany.

Funding

Federal Ministry of Education and Research FKZ 01EO1002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study assessed differences in interprofessional collaboration, perception of nonbeneficial care, and staff well-being between critical care and palliative care teams. In six German hospitals, a staff survey was conducted between December 2013 and March 2015 among nurses and physicians in intensive and palliative care units. To allow comparability between unit types, a matching was performed for demographic characteristics of staff. N = 313 critical care and 79 palliative care staff participated, of which 72 each were successfully matched. Critical care nurses perceived the poorest overall quality of collaboration compared with critical care physicians and palliative care physicians and nurses. They also reported less inclusive leadership from attendings and head nurses, and the least collaboration on care decisions with physicians. They were most likely to perceive nonbeneficial care, and they reported the lowest levels of job satisfaction and the highest intention to leave the job. In partial correlations, aspects of high-quality collaboration were associated with less perceived nonbeneficial care and higher staff well-being for both critical care and palliative care staff. Our findings indicate that critical care teams could improve collaboration and enhance well-being, particularly among nurses, by adopting principles of collaborative work culture as established in palliative care.

Indexed as

critical carecross-sectional surveyjob satisfactionoccupational stresspalliative carepatient care team

Identifiers

PMID38540566
PMCPMC10969805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.