Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38540520›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Leveraging Artificial Intelligence to Predict Health Belief Model and COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake Using Survey Text from US Nurses.

Samaneh Omranian, Alireza Khoddam, Celeste Campos-Castillo, Sajjad Fouladvand, Susan McRoy, Janet Rich-Edwards

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Samaneh OmranianDivision of Women's Health, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8974-2614
Alireza KhoddamDivision of Women's Health, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Celeste Campos-CastilloDepartment of Media and Information, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
Sajjad FouladvandStanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Susan McRoyDepartment of Computer Science, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI 53211, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4826-0947
Janet Rich-EdwardsDivision of Women's Health, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USMichigan State University · USStanford University · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Milwaukee · US

Funding

Life Course Cancer Epidemiology Cohort in WomenU01CA176726 · NCI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY D/B/A HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI ELIASSEN, A. HEATHER, WILLETT, WALTER C. · 2018 to 2025
$22.4M
Integrating lifecourse approaches, biologic and digital phenotypes in support of heart and lung disease epidemiologic researchU01HL145386 · NHLBI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY D/B/A HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI CHAVARRO, JORGE EDUARDO, MANSON, JOANN ELISABETH · 2019 to 2025
$17.8M
Premonopausal Hormone Levels and Risk of Breast CancerR01CA067262 · NCI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI HANKINSON, SUSAN E · 2002 to 2011
$11.9M
Causes and Impact of Minority Stress on Health and Development in YouthR01HD057368 · NICHD · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI AUSTIN, S BRYN, ROSARIO, MARGARET · 2009 to 2013
$3.3M
Nurses Health Study 3: A multiple exposure environmental epidemiology cohort of young adultsR24ES028521 · NIEHS · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI CHAVARRO, JORGE EDUARDO, LADEN, FRANCINE · 2018 to 2022
$2.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA067262NCI NIH HHS U01 CA176726NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL145386NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD057368NIEHS NIH HHS R24 ES028521
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigated how artificial intelligence (AI) reveals factors shaping COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among healthcare providers by examining their open-text comments. We conducted a longitudinal survey starting in Spring of 2020 with 38,788 current and former female nurses in three national cohorts to assess how the pandemic has affected their livelihood. In January and March-April 2021 surveys, participants were invited to contribute open-text comments and answer specific questions about COVID-19 vaccine uptake. A closed-ended question in the survey identified vaccine-hesitant (VH) participants who either had no intention or were unsure of receiving a COVID-19 vaccine. We collected 1970 comments from VH participants and trained two machine learning (ML) algorithms to identify behavioral factors related to VH. The first predictive model classified each comment into one of three health belief model (HBM) constructs (barriers, severity, and susceptibility) related to adopting disease prevention activities. The second predictive model used the words in January comments to predict the vaccine status of VH in March-April 2021; vaccine status was correctly predicted 89% of the time. Our results showed that 35% of VH participants cited barriers, 17% severity, and 7% susceptibility to receiving a COVID-19 vaccine. Out of the HBM constructs, the VH participants citing a barrier, such as allergic reactions and side effects, had the most associated change in vaccine status from VH to later receiving a vaccine.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceCOVID-19 vaccinationhealth belief modelhealthcare providersnatural language processingNurses’ Health Studytext classificationvaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID38540520
PMCPMC10968019
OpenAlexW4392563239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.