ArticleGenes2024
Optimization and Performance Analysis of CAT Method for DNA Sequence Similarity Searching and Alignment.
Article in Genes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bioinformatics is a rapidly developing field enabling scientific experiments via computer models and simulations. In recent years, there has been an extraordinary growth in biological databases. Therefore, it is extremely important to propose effective methods and algorithms for the fast and accurate processing of biological data. Sequence comparisons are the best way to investigate and understand the biological functions and evolutionary relationships between genes on the basis of the alignment of two or more DNA sequences in order to maximize the identity level and degree of similarity. This paper presents a new version of the pairwise DNA sequences alignment algorithm, based on a new method called CAT, where a dependency with a previous match and the closest neighbor are taken into consideration to increase the uniqueness of the CAT profile and to reduce possible collisions, i.e., two or more sequence with the same CAT profiles. This makes the proposed algorithm suitable for finding the exact match of a concrete DNA sequence in a large set of DNA data faster. In order to enable the usage of the profiles as sequence metadata, CAT profiles are generated once prior to data uploading to the database. The proposed algorithm consists of two main stages: CAT profile calculation depending on the chosen benchmark sequences and sequence comparison by using the calculated CAT profiles. Improvements in the generation of the CAT profiles are detailed and described in this paper. Block schemes, pseudo code tables, and figures were updated according to the proposed new version and experimental results. Experiments were carried out using the new version of the CAT method for DNA sequence alignment and different datasets. New experimental results regarding collisions, speed, and efficiency of the suggested new implementation are presented. Experiments related to the performance comparison with Needleman-Wunsch were re-executed with the new version of the algorithm to confirm that we have the same performance. A performance analysis of the proposed algorithm based on the CAT method against the Knuth-Morris-Pratt algorithm, which has a complexity of O(n) and is widely used for biological data searching, was performed. The impact of prior matching dependencies on uniqueness for generated CAT profiles is investigated. The experimental results from sequence alignment demonstrate that the proposed CAT method-based algorithm exhibits minimal deviation, which can be deemed negligible if such deviation is considered permissible in favor of enhanced performance. It should be noted that the performance of the CAT algorithm in terms of execution time remains stable, unaffected by the length of the analyzed sequences. Hence, the primary benefit of the suggested approach lies in its rapid processing capabilities in large-scale sequence alignment, a task that traditional exact algorithms would require significantly more time to perform.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.