Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38539975›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2024

From Microscale Interactions to Macroscale Patterns in Copepod-Crinoid Symbiosis.

Oksana A Korzhavina, Natalia V Gubareva, Andrey V Kitashov, Temir A Britayev, Viatcheslav N Ivanenko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Oksana A KorzhavinaDepartment of Invertebrate Zoology, Biological Faculty, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow 119991, Russia.
Natalia V GubarevaFaculty of Biology, Shenzhen MSU-BIT University, Shenzhen 518115, China.
Andrey V KitashovDepartment of Invertebrate Zoology, Biological Faculty, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow 119991, Russia.
Temir A BritayevA.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Science, Moscow 129164, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-4707-3496
Viatcheslav N IvanenkoDepartment of Invertebrate Zoology, Biological Faculty, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow 119991, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-1255-0491

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 22-24-00365
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Crinoids (Echinodermata) exhibit unique morphological and behavioral characteristics that facilitate a wide range of symbiotic relationships with diverse organisms. Our comprehension of their interactions with microscopic copepod crustaceans is, however, still in a nascent and fragmented state. Here, we review and discuss the 166 literature records to date in which a total of 39 copepod species in 6 families have been reported in association with 33 species of the crinoid order Comatulida. Many of these associations have been reported just once. The respective localities cover 5 of the World Ocean's 12 ecoregions, with a notable concentration of both host and symbiont diversity in the Central and Western Indo-Pacific. In contrast, the documentation of copepod-crinoid associations in the Atlantic appears markedly limited. Copepods have been found predominantly in ectosymbiotic relationships with crinoids, with a lower incidence of endosymbiosis. Copepods of the genera

Indexed as

Comatulidacopepod associationscrinoidshost-symbiont interactionsmarine biodiversitymarine ecologymarine invertebratesmarine parasitologysymbiotic relationships

Identifiers

PMID38539975
PMCPMC10967334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.