Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38539968›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2024

Fetal Programming Influence on Microbiome Diversity and Ruminal and Cecal Epithelium in Beef Cattle.

Evandro Fernando Ferreira Dias, Felipe Eguti de Carvalho, Guilherme Henrique Gebim Polizel, Fernando Augusto Correia Queiroz Cançado, Édison Furlan, Arícia Christofaro Fernandes, Fernando José Schalch Júnior, Gianluca Elmi Chagas Santos, José Bento Sterman Ferraz, Miguel Henrique de Almeida Santana

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Evandro Fernando Ferreira DiasDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Animal Science and Food Engineering-USP, Av. Duque de Caxias Norte, 225, Pirassununga 13635-900, SP, Brazil.
Felipe Eguti de CarvalhoDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Animal Science and Food Engineering-USP, Av. Duque de Caxias Norte, 225, Pirassununga 13635-900, SP, Brazil.
Guilherme Henrique Gebim PolizelDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Animal Science and Food Engineering-USP, Av. Duque de Caxias Norte, 225, Pirassununga 13635-900, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8497-9898
Fernando Augusto Correia Queiroz CançadoDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Animal Science and Food Engineering-USP, Av. Duque de Caxias Norte, 225, Pirassununga 13635-900, SP, Brazil.
Édison FurlanDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Animal Science and Food Engineering-USP, Av. Duque de Caxias Norte, 225, Pirassununga 13635-900, SP, Brazil.
Arícia Christofaro FernandesDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Animal Science and Food Engineering-USP, Av. Duque de Caxias Norte, 225, Pirassununga 13635-900, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2106-7912
Fernando José Schalch JúniorDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Animal Science and Food Engineering-USP, Av. Duque de Caxias Norte, 225, Pirassununga 13635-900, SP, Brazil.
Gianluca Elmi Chagas SantosDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Animal Science and Food Engineering-USP, Av. Duque de Caxias Norte, 225, Pirassununga 13635-900, SP, Brazil.
José Bento Sterman FerrazDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Animal Science and Food Engineering-USP, Av. Duque de Caxias Norte, 225, Pirassununga 13635-900, SP, Brazil.
Miguel Henrique de Almeida SantanaDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Animal Science and Food Engineering-USP, Av. Duque de Caxias Norte, 225, Pirassununga 13635-900, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9144-7697

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 17/12105-2Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 20/15192-6National Council for Scientific and Technological Development 307593/2021-5
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We explored the influence of maternal nutritional strategies on the development of the rumen and cecum in offspring. Additionally, we investigated the potential repercussions of prenatal nutrition on the rumen and fecal microbiota composition, utilizing metagenomic 16S techniques, to understand the effects of fetal programming (FP) in Nellore cattle. A total of 63 bulls submitted to different prenatal nutrition strategies, namely, non-programming (NP), partial programming (PP), and complete programming (CP), were evaluated. The rumen epithelium was methodically evaluated based on the presence of rumenitis and structural irregularities. The assessment of cecum lesions was conducted post-evisceration, whereby all thoroughly cleaned ceca were methodically evaluated. Samples from 15 animals of rumen fluid at slaughter and feces during the finishing phase were collected, respectively. All DNA extraction were carried out using the Macherey Nagel NucleoSpin Tissue

Indexed as

metabolismmetagenomicsnutrigenomicsprenatal nutritionrRNA 16s

Identifiers

PMID38539968
PMCPMC10967552
OpenAlexW4392697432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.