Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38539945›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2024

Effects of Multistrain Probiotic Supplementation on Sows' Emotional and Cognitive States and Progeny Welfare.

Melody Martins Cavalcante Pereira, Ines Andretta, Carolina Haubert Franceschi, Marcos Kipper, Alexandre Mariani, Thais Stefanello, Camila Carvalho, Júlio Vieira, Luiene Moura Rocha, Andrea Machado Leal Ribeiro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. The Role of Nutrition Across Production Stages to Improve Sow Longevity.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Melody Martins Cavalcante PereiraDepartment of Animal Science, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre 90010-150, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7966-5528
Ines AndrettaDepartment of Animal Science, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre 90010-150, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6205-4229
Carolina Haubert FranceschiDepartment of Animal Science, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre 90010-150, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1182-0314
Marcos KipperElanco Animal Health, São Paulo 04794-000, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6306-339X
Alexandre MarianiDepartment of Animal Science, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre 90010-150, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8121-9930
Thais StefanelloDepartment of Animal Science, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre 90010-150, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3686-6610
Camila CarvalhoDepartment of Pathobiology, Pharmacology and Zoological Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, 9000 Gent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-0398-9956
Júlio VieiraDepartment of Animal Science, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre 90010-150, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0006-0650-5415
Luiene Moura RochaQuebec Pork Development Center, Deschambault, QC G0A 1H0, Canada.ORCID 0009-0003-5266-6752
Andrea Machado Leal RibeiroDepartment of Animal Science, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre 90010-150, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0243-7946

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The intensification of production systems has resulted in detrimental effects on sow welfare, which can have an adverse influence on their offspring. Considering the relevance of the microbiota-gut-brain axis, probiotics can mitigate such impacts. To investigate the effects of the dietary inclusion of probiotics on the welfare of sows and piglets, 147 multiparous sows were randomly assigned to two groups: a control group or a group supplemented with a multistrain probiotic from the beginning of pregnancy to the end of lactation. The human-animal relationship (HAR), stereotypic behavior, position changes, salivary cortisol, and plasma serotonin levels were assessed in the sows. The piglets' back test behavior and organ weight were analyzed. The probiotic-supplemented sows exhibited a better HAR index (

Indexed as

feed additivegut–brain axismicrobiota metabolitespiglets

Identifiers

PMID38539945
PMCPMC10967343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.