Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38539926›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2024

The Distribution of Boars Spermatozoa in Morphometrically Distinct Subpopulations after In Vitro Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Radiation at 2500 MHz and Their Motility.

Ivona Žura Žaja, Silvijo Vince, Ivan Butković, Kim Senaši, Nina Poljičak Milas, Krešimir Malarić, Martina Lojkić, Ivan Folnožić, Suzana Milinković Tur, Mario Kreszinger and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ivona Žura ŽajaDepartment of Physiology and Radiobiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zagreb, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Silvijo VinceClinic of Obstetrics and Reproduction, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zagreb, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Ivan ButkovićClinic of Obstetrics and Reproduction, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zagreb, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Kim SenašiFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zagreb, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Nina Poljičak MilasDepartment of Pathological Physiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zagreb, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Krešimir MalarićDepartment of Communication and Space Technologies, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, University of Zagreb, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Martina LojkićClinic of Obstetrics and Reproduction, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zagreb, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0003-2718-3348
Ivan FolnožićClinic of Obstetrics and Reproduction, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zagreb, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Suzana Milinković TurDepartment of Physiology and Radiobiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zagreb, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Mario KreszingerClinic of Surgery, Orthopedics and Ophthalmology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zagreb, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Marko SamardžijaClinic of Obstetrics and Reproduction, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zagreb, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0003-0402-3173
Snježana ČipčićUniversity of Applied Health Sciences, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Nikolino ŽuraUniversity of Applied Health Sciences, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Mario OstovićDepartment of Animal Hygiene, Behaviour and Welfare, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zagreb, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-0253-0000
Marinko VilićDepartment of Physiology and Radiobiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zagreb, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0001-6453-6996
University of Zagreb · HRUniversity of Applied Health Sciences · HR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anthropogenic radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation (RF-EMR) from wireless technologies has increased dramatically. The boar semen used for artificial insemination is essential in sustaining the pig industry, and additionally it is also exposed to the effects of the RF-EMR of wireless technologies. Furthermore, there are no data on the effects of RF-EMR on semen quality, and this is the first analysis of sperm's morphometric parameters for assessing the effect of RF-EMR on the spermatozoa subpopulations of boars. This study investigated the effect of RF-EMR on in vitro exposed breeding boar semen spermatozoa motility and the proportions of spermatozoa subpopulations according to their morphometric head and tail parameters. The semen samples of 12 boars were divided into control and experimental groups. The samples in the experimental group were exposed in a gigahertz transverse electromagnetic chamber at a frequency of 2500 MHz (the frequency band used in 5G technology) and an electric field strength of 10 Vm

Indexed as

boarsexposuremorphometric analysisradiofrequency electromagnetic radiationspermatozoa subpopulations

Identifiers

PMID38539926
PMCPMC10967574
OpenAlexW4392545956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.