Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38539723›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Bitcoin Money Laundering Detection via Subgraph Contrastive Learning.

Shiyu Ouyang, Qianlan Bai, Hui Feng, Bo Hu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shiyu OuyangSchool of Information Science and Technology, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7612-9172
Qianlan BaiSchool of Computer Science, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Hui FengSchool of Information Science and Technology, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Bo HuSchool of Information Science and Technology, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid development of cryptocurrencies has led to an increasing severity of money laundering activities. In recent years, leveraging graph neural networks for cryptocurrency fraud detection has yielded promising results. However, many existing methods predominantly focus on node classification, i.e., detecting individual illicit transactions, rather than uncovering behavioral pattern differences among money laundering groups. In this paper, we tackle the challenges presented by the organized, heterogeneous, and noisy nature of Bitcoin money laundering. We propose a novel subgraph-based contrastive learning algorithm for heterogeneous graphs, named Bit-CHetG, to perform money laundering group detection. Specifically, we employ predefined metapaths to construct the homogeneous subgraphs of wallet addresses and transaction records from the address-transaction heterogeneous graph, enhancing our ability to capture heterogeneity. Subsequently, we utilize graph neural networks to separately extract the topological embedding representations of transaction subgraphs and associated address representations of transaction nodes. Lastly, supervised contrastive learning is introduced to reduce the effect of noise, which pulls together the transaction subgraphs with the same class while pushing apart the subgraphs with different classes. By conducting experiments on two real-world datasets with homogeneous and heterogeneous graphs, the Micro F1 Score of our proposed Bit-CHetG is improved by at least 5% compared to others.

Indexed as

anti-money launderingBitcoincontrastive learninggraph neural networkheterogeneous graph

Identifiers

PMID38539723
PMCPMC10969714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.