Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38539720›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2024

A Good View for Graph Contrastive Learning.

Xueyuan Chen, Shangzhe Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xueyuan ChenState Key Laboratory of Software Development Environment, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China.
Shangzhe LiSchool of Statistics and Mathematics, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 100081, China.

Funding

NSFC (Grant No. 61932002). 61932002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the success observed in deep neural networks with contrastive learning, there has been a notable surge in research interest in graph contrastive learning, primarily attributed to its superior performance in graphs with limited labeled data. Within contrastive learning, the selection of a "view" dictates the information captured by the representation, thereby influencing the model's performance. However, assessing the quality of information in these views poses challenges, and determining what constitutes a good view remains unclear. This paper addresses this issue by establishing the definition of a good view through the application of graph information bottleneck and structural entropy theories. Based on theoretical insights, we introduce CtrlGCL, a novel method for achieving a beneficial view in graph contrastive learning through coding tree representation learning. Extensive experiments were conducted to ascertain the effectiveness of the proposed view in unsupervised and semi-supervised learning. In particular, our approach, via CtrlGCL-H, yields an average accuracy enhancement of 1.06% under unsupervised learning when compared to GCL. This improvement underscores the efficacy of our proposed method.

Indexed as

coding tree representationgraph contrastive learningstructural entropy

Identifiers

PMID38539720
PMCPMC10969666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.