Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38539709›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Extended Hellwig's Method Utilizing Entropy-Based Weights and Mahalanobis Distance: Applications in Evaluating Sustainable Development in the Education Area.

Ewa Roszkowska, Marzena Filipowicz-Chomko, Anna Łyczkowska-Hanćkowiak, Elżbieta Majewska

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ewa RoszkowskaFaculty of Computer Science, Bialystok University of Technology, Wiejska 45A, 15-351 Bialystok, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2249-7217
Marzena Filipowicz-ChomkoFaculty of Computer Science, Bialystok University of Technology, Wiejska 45A, 15-351 Bialystok, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3041-4063
Anna Łyczkowska-HanćkowiakInstitute of Economics and Finance, WSB Merito University in Poznań, Ul. Powstańców Wielkopolskich 5, 61-895 Poznań, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6011-7855
Elżbieta MajewskaFaculty of Economics and Finance, University of Bialystok, Warszawska 63, 15-062 Bialystok, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2914-7941

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the crucial steps in the multi-criteria decision analysis involves establishing the importance of criteria and determining the relationship between them. This paper proposes an extended Hellwig's method (H_EM) that utilizes entropy-based weights and Mahalanobis distance to address this issue. By incorporating the concept of entropy, weights are determined based on their information content represented by the matrix data. The Mahalanobis distance is employed to address interdependencies among criteria, contributing to the improved performance of the proposed framework. To illustrate the relevance and effectiveness of the extended H_EM method, this study utilizes it to assess the progress toward achieving Sustainable Development Goal 4 of the 2030 Agenda within the European Union countries for education in the year 2021. Performance comparison is conducted between results obtained by the extended Hellwig's method and its other variants. The results reveal a significant impact on the ranking of the EU countries in the education area, depending on the choice of distance measure (Euclidean or Mahalanobis) and the system of weights (equal or entropy-based). Overall, this study highlights the potential of the proposed method in addressing complex decision-making scenarios with interdependent criteria.

Indexed as

educationentropy-based weightsEuclidean distanceHellwig’s methodMahalanobis distancemulti-criteria decision makingsustainable development

Identifiers

PMID38539709
PMCPMC10969085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.