Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38539706›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Principled Limitations on Self-Representation for Generic Physical Systems.

Chris Fields, James F Glazebrook, Michael Levin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Five Fristonian Formulae.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chris FieldsAllen Discovery Center, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4812-0744
James F GlazebrookDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, Eastern Illinois University, Charleston, IL 61920, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8335-221X
Michael LevinAllen Discovery Center, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7292-8084

Funding

AFOSR FA9550-22-1-0465John Templeton Foundation 62212
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ideas of self-observation and self-representation, and the concomitant idea of self-control, pervade both the cognitive and life sciences, arising in domains as diverse as immunology and robotics. Here, we ask in a very general way whether, and to what extent, these ideas make sense. Using a generic model of physical interactions, we prove a theorem and several corollaries that severely restrict applicable notions of self-observation, self-representation, and self-control. We show, in particular, that adding observational, representational, or control capabilities to a meta-level component of a system cannot, even in principle, lead to a complete meta-level representation of the system as a whole. We conclude that self-representation can at best be heuristic, and that self models cannot, in general, be empirically tested by the systems that implement them.

Indexed as

free energy principleGödel’s theoremMoore’s theoremquantum reference frameRice’s theoremseparability

Identifiers

PMID38539706
PMCPMC10969210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.