Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38539651›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2024

Neurorehabilitation including Virtual-Reality-Based Balance Therapy: Factors Associated with Training Response.

Evelyne Wiskerke, Jan Kool, Roger Hilfiker, Martin Sattelmayer, Geert Verheyden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Evelyne WiskerkeDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven-University of Leuven, 3001 Leuven, Belgium.
Jan KoolRehazentrum Valens, Kliniken Valens, 7317 Valens, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7074-8589
Roger HilfikerPhysiotherapy Tschopp & Hilfiker, 3902 Glis, Switzerland.
Martin SattelmayerSchool of Health Sciences, HES-SO Valais-Wallis, 3954 Leukerbad, Switzerland.
Geert VerheydenDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven-University of Leuven, 3001 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-3095-8175

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVirtual reality (VR) therapy is increasingly used and has shown encouraging effects. Yet, it is unknown which patients respond best to VR-based balance therapy as part of neurorehabilitation.

methodsData from 30 persons with stroke and 51 persons with multiple sclerosis who performed three to four weeks of VR-based balance therapy during in-patient rehabilitation were analysed. Participants were divided into responders and nonresponders based on achievement of the minimal clinically important difference in functional balance post intervention. Measures of balance, trunk function, mobility, gait, motivation, and exergame parameters were compared between groups.

resultsPost intervention, all clinical measurements significantly improved (

conclusionLower baseline balance ability, spending more time on adequately challenging exercises, and increased motivation potentially influence response to therapy. These factors can support the personalisation of VR-based balance therapy.

Indexed as

balancedigital therapeuticsexergamingmultiple sclerosisneurorehabilitationstroketherapy responsevirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID38539651
PMCPMC10968239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.