ArticleBrain sciences2024
Adherence to Epilepsy's Medical Recommendations.
Article in Brain sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neurologists' Views on the Management of Uncontrolled Epilepsy in Spain: A Preliminary Survey.Neurology and therapy · 2026Article
- The Role of Neurologists in the Management of Uncontrolled Epilepsy in Spain: Opportunities for Optimization.Neurology and therapy · 2026Review
- Article
- Etiology, Symptoms, and Treatment of Epilepsy: Advances and Perspectives.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Evaluating comorbidity scoring systems for flumatinib therapy in chronic myeloid leukemia: a machine learning and SHAP-based predictive analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Exploring the relationship of complementary therapy use and medication adherence among patients with epilepsy.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2025Article
- Medication self-management in patients with epilepsy: a narrative review of current status, influencing factors, and intervention strategies.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The primary problem in the treatment of epilepsy is poor seizure control. Several studies have shown that non-adherence to doctors' recommendations regarding drug dosage, time of drug administration as well as lifestyle modifications are the most frequent causes of the persistence or reoccurrence of seizures, other than cases of misdiagnosis and poor drug selection. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of non-compliance with medical recommendations, both in relation to medicine dosage, regularity of administration and lifestyle, and also to determine the factors affecting patients with diagnosed epilepsy. This study was carried out on a total of 169 patients diagnosed with epilepsy who were under the care of an outpatient neurology clinic. The assessment of compliance was performed using the Patient Rating of Compliance Scale (PRCS), Clinician Rating Scale (CRS) and authors' scale. Depending on the scale used, varying degrees of non-compliance were noted. They were as follows-65.3% on the authors' scale, 10% on the PRCS and 9% on the CRS. The following factors influenced compliance with doctors' recommendations: type of epilepsy, consumption of alcoholic beverages, frequency of follow-up visits to the neurology clinic, type of pharmacotherapy and number of medicines taken.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.