Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38539640›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2024

Dissociation between Selecting and Orienting Attentional Reading Deficits: A Study in Adults with Epilepsy.

Eric Siéroff, Yael Slama, Jordane Manouvrier, Agathe Laurent

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 97% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Eric SiéroffLMC2-Laboratoire Mémoire, Cerveau & Cognition UR 7536, Institute of Psychology, Paris-Cité University, 71 Avenue Edouard Vaillant, 92100 Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
Yael SlamaMaison de Santé Pluridisciplinaire, 95350 Saint-Brice-sous-Forêt, France.
Jordane ManouvrierAssistance Publique-Hôpitaux Universitaires de Marseille, 13005 Marseille, France.
Agathe LaurentService de Neurochirurgie, Hôpital Lariboisière, 75010 Paris, France.
Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille · FRHôpital Lariboisière · FRLaboratoire Mémoire et Cognition · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Word reading requires a range of spatial attention processes, such as orienting to a specific word and selecting it while ignoring other words. This study investigated whether deficits of these spatial attention processes can show dissociations after hemispheric lesions. Thirty-nine patients with left or right focal epilepsy and 66 healthy participants had to read aloud four-letter words presented in the left and right visual hemifields. There were three successive blocks of presentation: in the unilateral block, a single word was presented in one of the visual hemifields; in the bilateral block, two words were presented simultaneously, one in each visual hemifield; in the cued block, two words were also presented, but only the cued word had to be reported. Twenty-one patients, twelve with a left and nine with a right hemisphere lesion, showed a word reading deficit. Four had specific difficulties in the cued block, suggesting an attentional selection reading deficit. Twelve patients had an asymmetric reading deficit, suggesting an attention orientation or a visual field deficit. Five patients had more complex deficits. The visual field presentation procedure may help to reveal different types of reading disorders in patients with epilepsy and to dissociate orienting and selecting deficits.

Indexed as

attentionepilepsyhemispheric lesionreading deficitvisual field

Identifiers

PMID38539640
PMCPMC10968372
OpenAlexW4392461235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.