ArticleBrain sciences2024
Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of an Adventure Therapy Programme on Borderline Personality Disorder: A Pragmatic Controlled Clinical Trial.
Article in Brain sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- A scoping review of programmes that address the daily living functioning of people diagnosed with borderline personality disorder.The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry · 2026Article
- Reinforcing Gaps? A Rapid Review of Innovation in Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) Treatment.Brain sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Adventure Therapy (AT) is a therapeutic intervention utilizing the natural environment and adventure activities as tools for psychotherapeutic interventions. It has been demonstrated to be appropriate for the intervention of patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD). This study aims to evaluate the response to AT treatment compared with the response to treatment as usual (TAU), based on cognitive behavioural therapy, in the short and long term, assessing clinical, psychosocial, and functional outcomes; quality of life; and physical health levels. This study extends the sample of and is a follow-up to a pilot study published in 2021, with a sample of 30 patients in the AT group and 10 in the control group. It does not allow us to affirm that AT provides better outcomes than TAU, as the positive effects observed immediately after therapy seem to be attenuated in the long term. Therefore, the effectiveness of long-term psychotherapy did not show differences between AT and TAU therapies in the treatment of BPD patients. However, the effects of intangibles observed during therapy by professionals and patients were not reflected in the measurements collected. Therefore, we believe it is necessary to increase the programme duration, complement treatment with a specific physical health programme, assess results with more specific instruments, and/or move towards a qualitative methodology to measure perceived changes in clinical improvement. New studies are needed to evaluate the results of the proposed changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.