Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38539622›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2024

Natural Image Reconstruction from fMRI Based on Node-Edge Interaction and Multi-Scale Constraint.

Mei Kuang, Zongyi Zhan, Shaobing Gao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mei KuangCollege of Computer Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China.
Zongyi ZhanCollege of Computer Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China.ORCID 0009-0000-0491-3163
Shaobing GaoCollege of Computer Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China.

Funding

Sichuan University Innovation Spark Project 2019SCUH0007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reconstructing natural stimulus images using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is one of the most challenging problems in brain decoding and is also the crucial component of a brain-computer interface. Previous methods cannot fully exploit the information about interactions among brain regions. In this paper, we propose a natural image reconstruction method based on node-edge interaction and a multi-scale constraint. Inspired by the extensive information interactions in the brain, a novel graph neural network block with node-edge interaction (NEI-GNN block) is presented, which can adequately model the information exchange between brain areas via alternatively updating the nodes and edges. Additionally, to enhance the quality of reconstructed images in terms of both global structure and local detail, we employ a multi-stage reconstruction network that restricts the reconstructed images in a coarse-to-fine manner across multiple scales. Qualitative experiments on the generic object decoding (GOD) dataset demonstrate that the reconstructed images contain accurate structural information and rich texture details. Furthermore, the proposed method surpasses the existing state-of-the-art methods in terms of accuracy in the commonly used n-way evaluation. Our approach achieves 82.00%, 59.40%, 45.20% in n-way mean squared error (MSE) evaluation and 83.50%, 61.80%, 46.00% in n-way structural similarity index measure (SSIM) evaluation, respectively. Our experiments reveal the importance of information interaction among brain areas and also demonstrate the potential for developing visual-decoding brain-computer interfaces.

Indexed as

brain decodingfMRImulti–scale constraintnatural image reconstructionnode–edge interaction

Identifiers

PMID38539622
PMCPMC10968908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.