Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38539615›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2024

Can Brain Volume-Driven Characteristic Features Predict the Response of Alzheimer's Patients to Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation? A Pilot Study.

Chandan Saha, Chase R Figley, Brian Lithgow, Paul B Fitzgerald, Lisa Koski, Behzad Mansouri, Neda Anssari, Xikui Wang, Zahra Moussavi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Chandan SahaBiomedical Engineering Program, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 5V6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8814-3003
Chase R FigleyDepartment of Radiology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6573-461X
Brian LithgowBiomedical Engineering Program, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 5V6, Canada.
Paul B FitzgeraldDepartment of Psychiatry (MAPRC), Monash University, Melbourne VIC 3004, Australia.
Lisa KoskiDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Science, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 1G1, Canada.
Behzad MansouriBrain, Vision and Concussion Clinic-iScope, Winnipeg, MB R2M 2X9, Canada.
Neda AnssariBrain, Vision and Concussion Clinic-iScope, Winnipeg, MB R2M 2X9, Canada.
Xikui WangWarren Center for Actuarial Studies and Research, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 5V4, Canada.
Zahra MoussaviBiomedical Engineering Program, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 5V6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9202-949X

Funding

The co-author, P.B.F., was supported by a grant from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia 1193596Weston Brain Institute CT140075
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study is a post-hoc examination of baseline MRI data from a clinical trial investigating the efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) as a treatment for patients with mild-moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD). Herein, we investigated whether the analysis of baseline MRI data could predict the response of patients to rTMS treatment. Whole-brain T1-weighted MRI scans of 75 participants collected at baseline were analyzed. The analyses were run on the gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM) of the left and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), as that was the rTMS application site. The primary outcome measure was the Alzheimer's disease assessment scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog). The response to treatment was determined based on ADAS-Cog scores and secondary outcome measures. The analysis of covariance showed that responders to active treatment had a significantly lower baseline GM volume in the right DLPFC and a higher GM asymmetry index in the DLPFC region compared to those in non-responders. Logistic regression with a repeated five-fold cross-validated analysis using the MRI-driven features of the initial 75 participants provided a mean accuracy of 0.69 and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.74 for separating responders and non-responders. The results suggest that GM volume or asymmetry in the target area of active rTMS treatment (DLPFC region in this study) may be a weak predictor of rTMS treatment efficacy. These results need more data to draw more robust conclusions.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s disease (AD)DLPFCefficacy predictionMRI analysisrTMS treatment

Identifiers

PMID38539615
PMCPMC10968477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.