ArticleBrain sciences2024
Identification and Verification of Error-Related Potentials Based on Cerebellar Targets.
Article in Brain sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The error-related potential (ErrP) is a weak explicit representation of the human brain for individual wrong behaviors. Previously, ErrP-related research usually focused on the design of automatic correction and the error correction mechanisms of high-risk pipeline-type judgment systems. Mounting evidence suggests that the cerebellum plays an important role in various cognitive processes. Thus, this study introduced cerebellar information to enhance the online classification effect of error-related potentials. We introduced cerebellar regional characteristics and improved discriminative canonical pattern matching (DCPM) in terms of data training and model building. In addition, this study focused on the application value and significance of cerebellar error-related potential characterization in the selection of excellent ErrP-BCI subjects (brain-computer interface). Here, we studied a specific ErrP, the so-called feedback ErrP. Thirty participants participated in this study. The comparative experiments showed that the improved DCPM classification algorithm proposed in this paper improved the balance accuracy by approximately 5-10% compared with the original algorithm. In addition, a correlation analysis was conducted between the error-related potential indicators of each brain region and the classification effect of feedback ErrP-BCI data, and the Fisher coefficient of the cerebellar region was determined as the quantitative screening index of the subjects. The screened subjects were superior to other subjects in the performance of the classification algorithm, and the performance of the classification algorithm was improved by up to 10%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.