Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38539598›Full record

ReviewBrain sciences2024

The Constrained Disorder Principle May Account for Consciousness.

Tal Sigawi, Omer Hamtzany, Josef Daniel Shakargy, Yaron Ilan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tal SigawiDepartment of Medicine, Hadassah Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem IL12000, Israel.
Omer HamtzanyDepartment of Medicine, Hadassah Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem IL12000, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-2843-2601
Josef Daniel ShakargyDepartment of Medicine, Hadassah Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem IL12000, Israel.
Yaron IlanDepartment of Medicine, Hadassah Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem IL12000, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-0802-1220

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is still controversy surrounding the definition and mechanisms of consciousness. The constrained disorder principle (CDP) defines complex systems by their dynamic borders, limiting their inherent disorder. In line with the CDP, the brain exhibits a disorder bounded by dynamic borders essential for proper function, efficient energy use, and life support under continuous perturbations. The brain's inherent variability contributes to its adaptability and flexibility. Neuronal signal variability challenges the association of brain structures with consciousness and methods for assessing consciousness. The present paper discusses some theories about consciousness, emphasizing their failure to explain the brain's variability. This paper describes how the CDP accounts for consciousness's variability, complexity, entropy, and uncertainty. Using newly developed second-generation artificial intelligence systems, we describe how CDP-based platforms may improve disorders of consciousness (DoC) by accounting for consciousness variability, complexity, entropy, and uncertainty. This platform could be used to improve response to current interventions and develop new therapeutic regimens for patients with DoC in future studies.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceconsciousnessdisorderrandomness

Identifiers

PMID38539598
PMCPMC10968910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.