Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38539544›Full record

ArticleCancers2024

Clinical Workflow of Cone Beam Computer Tomography-Based Daily Online Adaptive Radiotherapy with Offline Magnetic Resonance Guidance: The Modular Adaptive Radiotherapy System (MARS).

Ji-Young Kim, Bouchra Tawk, Maximilian Knoll, Philipp Hoegen-Saßmannshausen, Jakob Liermann, Peter E Huber, Mona Lifferth, Clemens Lang, Peter Häring, Regula Gnirs and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. [Simulation-free radiation therapy in palliative care].Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Ji-Young KimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0775-8565
Bouchra TawkDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Maximilian KnollDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9037-3980
Philipp Hoegen-SaßmannshausenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Jakob LiermannDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Peter E HuberDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Mona LifferthDivision of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Clemens LangDivision of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Peter HäringDivision of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Regula GnirsDivision of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Oliver JäkelHeidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6056-9747
Heinz-Peter SchlemmerDivision of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Jürgen DebusDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Juliane Hörner-RieberDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Fabian WeykampDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1731-7090

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe Ethos (Varian Medical Systems) radiotherapy device combines semi-automated anatomy detection and plan generation for cone beam computer tomography (CBCT)-based daily online adaptive radiotherapy (oART). However, CBCT offers less soft tissue contrast than magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This work aims to present the clinical workflow of CBCT-based oART with shuttle-based offline MR guidance.

methodsFrom February to November 2023, 31 patients underwent radiotherapy on the Ethos (Varian, Palo Alto, CA, USA) system with machine learning (ML)-supported daily oART. Moreover, patients received weekly MRI in treatment position, which was utilized for daily plan adaptation, via a shuttle-based system. Initial and adapted treatment plans were generated using the Ethos treatment planning system. Patient clinical data, fractional session times (MRI + shuttle transport + positioning, adaptation, QA, RT delivery) and plan selection were assessed for all fractions in all patients.

resultsIn total, 737 oART fractions were applied and 118 MRIs for offline MR guidance were acquired. Primary sites of tumors were prostate (

conclusionThis study describes the first workflow to date of a CBCT-based oART combined with a shuttle-based offline approach for MR guidance. The oART duration times reported resemble the range shown by previous publications for first clinical experiences with the Ethos system.

Indexed as

EthosMR-guided radiotherapyonline adaptive radiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID38539544
PMCPMC10969008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.