ReviewCancers2024
Harnessing ctDNA in Advanced Melanoma: A Promising Tool for Informed Clinical Decisions.
Review in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Pregnancy-Associated Melanoma: A Molecular Reappraisal of the Hormonal Hypothesis, Illustrated by a Postpartum-Persistent Melanoma In Situ.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Role of CTLA-4 blockade and dacarbazine therapy following anti-PD-1 resistance in melanoma.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Acral Melanoma in Ethnic Lebanese Arab Patients: 12-Year Experience with a Rare Disease in the MENA Region.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- In-depth assessment of BRAF, NRAS, KRAS, EGFR, and PIK3CA mutations on cell-free DNA in the blood of melanoma patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibition.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2025Article
- Circulating tumor DNA monitoring in advanced mutated melanoma (LIQUID-MEL).The journal of liquid biopsy · 2025Article
- Review
- Prognostic Biomarkers in Evolving Melanoma Immunotherapy.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2025Review
- Clinical and Imaging Follow-Up for High-Risk Cutaneous Melanoma: Current Evidence and Guidelines.Cancers · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cutaneous melanoma, an aggressive malignancy, has undergone significant transformation in clinical management with the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and targeted therapies. Current monitoring methods, such as imaging scans, present limitations, prompting exploration of alternative biomarkers. This review comprehensively explores the role of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in advanced melanoma, covering technical aspects, detection methods, and its prognostic and predictive value. Recent findings underscore ctDNA's potential applications and implications in clinical practice. This review emphasizes the need for precise and dynamic biomarkers in melanoma care, positioning ctDNA as a promising blood-based tool for prognosis, treatment response, and resistance mechanisms. The technical nuances of ctDNA detection, association with melanoma mutations, and its role in guiding therapeutic decisions for immunotherapy and targeted therapy underscore its multifaceted utility, marking a paradigm shift in clinical decision-making and offering a promising trajectory for personalized and informed care in advanced melanoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.