Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38539527›Full record

ArticleCancers2024

The Added Value of Transcatheter CT Hepatic Angiography (CTHA) Image Guidance in Percutaneous Thermal Liver Ablation: An Experts' Opinion Pictorial Essay.

Robbert S Puijk, Madelon Dijkstra, Susan van der Lei, Hannah H Schulz, Danielle J W Vos, Florentine E F Timmer, Bart Geboers, Hester J Scheffer, Jan J J de Vries, Maarten L J Smits and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Robbert S PuijkDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3293-4433
Madelon DijkstraDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5740-321X
Susan van der LeiDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6413-476X
Hannah H SchulzDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Danielle J W VosDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0000-3733-8417
Florentine E F TimmerDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6388-9001
Bart GeboersDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8137-9299
Hester J SchefferDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jan J J de VriesDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, OLVG, 1091 AC Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Maarten L J SmitsDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, UMC Utrecht, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Rutger C G BruijnenDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, UMC Utrecht, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Frédéric DeschampsDepartement d'Anesthésie, de Chirurgie, et de Radiologie Interventionnelle, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, 94805 Villejuif, France.
Thierry de BaèreDepartement d'Anesthésie, de Chirurgie, et de Radiologie Interventionnelle, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, 94805 Villejuif, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4556-7663
Bruno C OdisioDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Unit 1471, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030-4009, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1771-8233
Martijn R MeijerinkDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1500-7294
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLOLVG · NLUniversité Paris-Saclay · FRUtrecht University · NLGarvan Institute of Medical Research · AUNoordwest Ziekenhuisgroep · NLThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the rapidly evolving field of image-guided tumor ablation, there is an increasing demand and need for tools to optimize treatment success. Known factors affecting the success of (non-)thermal liver ablation procedures are the ability to optimize tumor and surrounding critical structure visualization, ablation applicator targeting, and ablation zone confirmation. A recent study showed superior local tumor progression-free survival and local control outcomes when using transcatheter computed tomography hepatic angiography (CTHA) guidance in percutaneous liver ablation procedures. This pictorial review provides eight clinical cases from three institutions, MD Anderson (Houston, TX, USA), Gustave Roussy (Paris, France), and Amsterdam UMC (Amsterdam, The Netherlands), with the intent to demonstrate the added value of real-time CTHA guided tumor ablation for primary liver tumors and liver-only metastatic disease. The clinical illustrations highlight the ability to improve the detectability of the initial target liver tumor(s) and identify surrounding critical vascular structures, detect 'vanished' and/or additional tumors intraprocedurally, differentiate local tumor progression from non-enhancing scar tissue, and promptly detect and respond to iatrogenic hemorrhagic events. Although at the cost of adding a minor but safe intervention, CTHA-guided liver tumor ablation minimizes complications of the actual ablation procedure, reduces the number of repeat ablations, and improves the oncological outcome of patients with liver malignancies. Therefore, we recommend adopting CTHA as a potential quality-improving guiding method within the (inter)national standards of practice.

Indexed as

computed tomography (CT)CT hepatic arteriography (CTHA)image guidanceliver tumormicrowave ablation (MWA)quality controlradiofrequency ablation (RFA)thermal liver ablation

Identifiers

PMID38539527
PMCPMC10969731
OpenAlexW4392915515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.