ReviewCancers2024
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Male Fertility: Should Fertility Preservation Options Be Considered before Treatment?
Review in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fertility protection in the reproductive-age population: A evolutionary concept analysis.International journal of nursing sciences · 2026Review
- Fertility treatment using assisted reproductive technology during immune checkpoint inhibition: report of two cases.The oncologist · 2026Article
- Investigation of the protective effects of hesperidin against nivolumab toxicity in rat testis tissue.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Impact of immunotherapy and small molecule cancer therapy on fertility: a narrative review of current evidence, mechanisms and future directions.BMJ oncology · 2026Review
- Prevalence and Characteristics of Sexual Dysfunction in Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Adjuvant Immunotherapy in Stage IIB/IIC Melanoma: Current Evidence and Future Directions.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- The expression of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) involves in the clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic implications of testicular germ cell tumor (TGCT): a systematic review and meta-analysis.Translational cancer research · 2024Article
- Evaluating the Reproductive Impact of Pembrolizumab in Mice: Ovarian Function and Hormonal Changes.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
- Update and new advances in fertility preservation and cancer.CA: a cancer journal for cliniciansReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In recent years, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become a viable option for many cancer patients, including specific subgroups of pediatric patients. Despite their efficiency in treating different types of cancer, ICIs are responsible for a number of immune-related adverse events, including inflammatory toxicities, that can affect several organs. However, our knowledge of the impact of ICIs on the testis and male fertility is limited. It is possible that ICI treatment affects testicular function and spermatogenesis either directly or indirectly (or both). Treatment with ICIs may cause increased inflammation and immune cell infiltration within the seminiferous tubules of the testis, disturbing spermatogenesis or testosterone deficiency (primary hypogonadism). Additionally, the interference of ICIs with the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis may alter testosterone production, affecting testicular function (secondary hypogonadism) and spermatogenesis. This review provides an overview of the available evidence on the potential association between ICIs and the disruption of spermatogenesis, with special focus on ICIs targeting cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4), programmed death protein 1 (PD-1) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1). Moreover, it highlights the need for further investigations and encourages the discussion of associated risks and fertility-preservation considerations between clinicians and patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.