Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38539305›Full record

ReviewChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Small Scale, High Precision: Robotic Surgery in Neonatal and Pediatric Patients-A Narrative Review.

Emil Radu Iacob, Roxana Iacob, Laura Andreea Ghenciu, Tudor-Alexandru Popoiu, Emil Robert Stoicescu, Calin Marius Popoiu

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Pediatrics 4.0: the Transformative Impacts of the Latest Industrial Revolution on Pediatrics.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Emil Radu IacobDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, 'Victor Babes' University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timișoara, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-5863-6613
Roxana IacobDepartment of Anatomy and Embriology, 'Victor Babes' University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timișoara, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-2894-712X
Laura Andreea GhenciuDiscipline of Pathophysiology, "Victor Babeș" University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timișoara, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-5326-5438
Tudor-Alexandru PopoiuDoctoral School, 'Victor Babes' University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.
Emil Robert StoicescuFaculty of Mechanics, Field of Applied Engineering Sciences, Specialization Statistical Methods and Techniques in Health and Clinical Research, 'Politehnica' University Timisoara, Mihai Viteazul Boulevard No. 1, 300222 Timisoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-4620-3340
Calin Marius PopoiuDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, 'Victor Babes' University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timișoara, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.
Victor Babeș University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timișoara · ROPolytechnic University of Timişoara · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This narrative review explores the evolution and implications of robotic-assisted surgery in pediatric and neonatal cases, focusing on its advantages, drawbacks, and the specific diseases amenable to this innovative technology. Following PRISMA guidelines, 56 relevant articles from the past five years were selected, emphasizing advancements in precision, reduced trauma, and expedited recovery times for pediatric patients. Despite challenges like cost and training, ongoing research shapes pediatric robotic-assisted surgery, promising improved outcomes. The technology's benefits include enhanced precision, minimized scarring, and faster recovery, addressing the challenges in delicate pediatric procedures. Challenges encompass cost, training, and instrument design, but ongoing refinements aim to overcome these. This review underscores psychological and musculoskeletal considerations for patients and surgeons. While acknowledging limitations and preferred pathologies, this review outlines the transformative potential of robotic-assisted surgery in reshaping pediatric surgical care. This comprehensive assessment concludes that, despite challenges, ongoing advancements promise a future of enhanced precision and tailored care in pediatric surgery.

Indexed as

minimally invasive surgeryneonatal surgerypediatric surgeryrobot-assisted surgerysurgical devices

Identifiers

PMID38539305
PMCPMC10968808
OpenAlexW4392004502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.