Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38539302›Full record

ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Understanding and Breaking the Intergenerational Cycle of Abuse in Families Enrolled in Routine Mental Health and Welfare Services by Investigating the Feasibility and Effectiveness of a Mentalization-Based Early Intervention Program (UBICA-II Study): Study Protocol for a Non-Randomized, Open-Label, Single-Arm Feasibility Study.

Denise Dittmann, Astrid Dempfle, Anke Nießen, Ira Puchert, Kerstin Konrad, Beate Herpertz-Dahlmann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 97% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Denise DittmannDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy of the RWTH Aachen, Neuenhoferweg 21, 52074 Aachen, Germany.
Astrid DempfleInstitute of Medical Informatics and Statistics, Kiel University and University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, 24118 Kiel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2618-3920
Anke NießenDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy of the RWTH Aachen, Neuenhoferweg 21, 52074 Aachen, Germany.
Ira PuchertDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy of the RWTH Aachen, Neuenhoferweg 21, 52074 Aachen, Germany.
Kerstin KonradDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy of the RWTH Aachen, Child Neuropsychology Section, University Hospital Aachen, Neuenhoferweg 21, 52074 Aachen, Germany.
Beate Herpertz-DahlmannDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy of the RWTH Aachen, Neuenhoferweg 21, 52074 Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8450-3323
RWTH Aachen University · DEUniversitätsklinikum Aachen · DEChristian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel · DE

Funding

German Ministry of Research and Education (BMBF) 01KR1803A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although home visiting programs have generally shown small overall effects on the prevention of child maltreatment, at-risk families with severe strain do not seem to benefit sufficiently from this support. A crucial factor for success seems to be the quality of the service system. The aim of the current study is to evaluate the effects of mentalization-based team supervision on the already existing welfare service of a German early prevention program (EPP). This will be a non-randomized, open-label, single-arm feasibility study. The EPP staff will be trained according to the mentalization-based team approach (MB-TA) and regularly receive MFT supervision by a trained and experienced child and adolescent psychiatrist. A minimum of eighty-four families with defined risk factors with children below 24 months of age and pregnant women in the third trimester will be included. Assessments will take place at T0 (after inclusion in the study), at T1 (after family care ends, as an intermediate assessment,) and at T2 (as a follow-up). We hypothesize that the risk of maltreatment can be reduced by strengthening the skills and capacities of the primary care system. This will be evaluated at the end of the follow-up period by comparing the Parental Stress Index (PSI) scores of all participants pre- and postintervention. Stress levels and mentalization abilities will be assessed as feasibility endpoints for the participating EPP teams.

Indexed as

early prevention program plusmentalization-based integrative team approachtransgenerational transmission of abuse

Identifiers

PMID38539302
PMCPMC10969746
OpenAlexW4391953681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.