ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2024
Relationship between albumin-corrected anion gap and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease varied in different waist circumference groups: a cross-sectional study.
Article in European journal of medical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association of ACAG with short-term mortality in liver failure patients: a retrospective analysis based on the MIMIC-IV database.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Anion gap predicting 90-Day mortality and guiding furosemide use in ARDS.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Relationship between albumin-corrected anion gap and lumbar spine bone mineral density: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in aging · 2025Article
- Relationship between albumin-corrected anion gap and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a cross-sectional analysis of NHANES 2017-2018.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Association of albumin-corrected anion gap with severe consciousness disorders and outcomes in ischemic stroke: a retrospective MIMIC analysis.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo investigate the association of albumin-corrected anion gap (ACAG) with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and clinically significant fibrosis (CSF) defined by vibration-controlled transient elastography measurements.
methodsThis cross-sectional study including 4531 participants was conducted using the data from the NHANES database of cycles 2017-2018. The outcomes were set as NAFLD vs. non-NAFLD and NAFLD with CSF vs. NAFLD without CSF. The generalized additive model and restricted cubic spline analyses were used to assess the nonlinear relationship. The generalized linear models, logistic regression models, sensitivity analysis, P trend test, subgroup analysis, and mediation analysis were employed to analyze the association. Finally, an ACAG-based model was constructed and evaluated.
resultsA higher ACAG level was an independent risk factor for NAFLD (P < 0.05), but not for CSF (P > 0.05). The sensitivity analysis and P trend test results substantiated the significantly positive relationship between ACAG and NAFLD (P < 0.05). Interestingly, the obvious connection between ACAG and NAFLD varied in different waist circumference groups and played a central role in the central obesity group. In addition, alanine aminotransferase and waist circumference were the mediators in their relationship. Moreover, the ACAG-based model performed well in predicting NAFLD.
conclusionsACAG level is independently associated with NAFLD but not CSF. ACAG might be a novel and reliable biomarker for predicting NAFLD clinically especially in the central obesity population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.