Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38539265›Full record

Observational studyParasites & vectors2024

Effects of rodent abundance on ticks and Borrelia: results from an experimental and observational study in an island system.

Nosheen Kiran, Ilze Brila, Tapio Mappes, Saana Sipari, Yingying Wang, Erin Welsh, Eva R Kallio

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Parasites & vectors, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nosheen KiranDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland. nosheen.n.kiran@jyu.fi.
Ilze BrilaDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1518-1380
Tapio MappesDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5936-7355
Saana SipariDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8846-1538
Yingying WangDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3066-197X
Erin WelshDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Eva R KallioDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2991-612X
University of Jyväskylä · FI

Funding

Academy of Finland 329308, 329332, 335651, 329326
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLyme borreliosis is the most common tick-borne disease in Europe and is often caused by Borrelia afzelii, which is transmitted by Ixodes ricinus ticks. The prevalence and abundance of infected ticks fluctuate in time and space, influencing human infection risk. Rodents are reservoir hosts for B. afzelii and important feeding hosts for larval ticks. In the study reported here, we examined how variation in rodent abundance is associated with B. afzelii infection prevalence in ticks, the density of nymphs (DON) and the density of infected nymphs (DIN) in the following year. We further analysed the relationships between the abundance of infected rodents and nymphal infection prevalence (NIP) and DIN.

methodsWe conducted a study that combined experimental and observational approaches on 15 islands (10 small islands and 5 large islands) in Finland. On all of the islands, ticks and rodents were monitored and sampled during the summer of 2019, with the monitoring of tick abundance and sampling continuing into the spring of 2020. On five of the 10 small islands, captured rodents were removed from the island ("removal" islands), and on the other five small islands, captured rodents were released back to the trapping site after marking and sampling ("control" islands). On the five large islands, captured rodents were released back to the trapping site after marking and sampling. The presence of B. afzelii from nymph and rodent samples was examined.

resultsThe results of the experimental study showed that neither treatment (removal), rodent abundance index nor abundance index of infected rodents in 2019 was associated with DON, NIP or DIN in 2020. Based on data from the observational study, the NIP in 2020 decreased with increasing rodent abundance index and abundance index of infected rodents in 2019. However, the DIN in 2020 was not associated with the rodent abundance index or the abundance index of infected rodents in 2019. In addition, in the observational study, DON in 2020 increased with increasing rodent abundance index.

conclusionsOur results suggest that low rodent abundance during the tick activity period is not sufficient for reducing the disease hazard and, hence, rodent removal may not be a feasible control measure in natural ecosystems.

Indexed as

BorreliaBorrelia burgdorferi GroupIxodesLyme DiseaseAnimalsEcosystemHumansNymphRodentiaBorrelia afzeliiBorrelia burgdorferiHost abundanceInfection prevalenceIxodes ricinusNymphs

Identifiers

PMID38539265
PMCPMC10967205
OpenAlexW4393225277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.