Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38539236›Full record

ArticleEcho research and practice2024

Validation of machine learning models for estimation of left ventricular ejection fraction on point-of-care ultrasound: insights on features that impact performance.

Christina L Luong, Mohammad H Jafari, Delaram Behnami, Yaksh R Shah, Lynn Straatman, Nathan Van Woudenberg, Leah Christoff, Nancy Gwadry, Nathaniel M Hawkins, Eric C Sayre and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Echo research and practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Christina L Luong *Division of Cardiology, Diamond Health Care Centre 9th Floor Cardiology, University of British Columbia, 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada. christina.luong@ubc.ca.
Mohammad H Jafari *Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of British Columbia, 5500-2332 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Delaram Behnami *Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of British Columbia, 5500-2332 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Yaksh R Shah *Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada.
Lynn StraatmanDivision of Cardiology, Diamond Health Care Centre 9th Floor Cardiology, University of British Columbia, 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada.
Nathan Van WoudenbergDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of British Columbia, 5500-2332 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Leah ChristoffDivision of Cardiology, Diamond Health Care Centre 9th Floor Cardiology, University of British Columbia, 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada.
Nancy GwadryDivision of Cardiology, Diamond Health Care Centre 9th Floor Cardiology, University of British Columbia, 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada.
Nathaniel M HawkinsDivision of Cardiology, Diamond Health Care Centre 9th Floor Cardiology, University of British Columbia, 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada.
Eric C SayreBritish Columbia Centre On Substance Use, 1045 Howe St Suite 400, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 2A9, Canada.
Darwin YeungDivision of Cardiology, Diamond Health Care Centre 9th Floor Cardiology, University of British Columbia, 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada.
Michael TsangDivision of Cardiology, Diamond Health Care Centre 9th Floor Cardiology, University of British Columbia, 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada.
Ken GinDivision of Cardiology, Diamond Health Care Centre 9th Floor Cardiology, University of British Columbia, 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada.
John JueDivision of Cardiology, Diamond Health Care Centre 9th Floor Cardiology, University of British Columbia, 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada.
Parvathy NairDivision of Cardiology, Diamond Health Care Centre 9th Floor Cardiology, University of British Columbia, 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada.
Purang Abolmaesumi *Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of British Columbia, 5500-2332 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Teresa Tsang *Division of Cardiology, Diamond Health Care Centre 9th Floor Cardiology, University of British Columbia, 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMachine learning (ML) algorithms can accurately estimate left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) from echocardiography, but their performance on cardiac point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is not well understood.

objectivesWe evaluate the performance of an ML model for estimation of LVEF on cardiac POCUS compared with Level III echocardiographers' interpretation and formal echo reported LVEF.

methodsClinicians at a tertiary care heart failure clinic prospectively scanned 138 participants using hand-carried devices. Video data were analyzed offline by an ML model for LVEF. We compared the ML model's performance with Level III echocardiographers' interpretation and echo reported LVEF.

resultsThere were 138 participants scanned, yielding 1257 videos. The ML model generated LVEF predictions on 341 videos. We observed a good intraclass correlation (ICC) between the ML model's predictions and the reference standards (ICC = 0.77-0.84). When comparing LVEF estimates for randomized single POCUS videos, the ICC between the ML model and Level III echocardiographers' estimates was 0.772, and it was 0.778 for videos where quantitative LVEF was feasible. When the Level III echocardiographer reviewed all POCUS videos for a participant, the ICC improved to 0.794 and 0.843 when only accounting for studies that could be segmented. The ML model's LVEF estimates also correlated well with LVEF derived from formal echocardiogram reports (ICC = 0.798).

conclusionOur results suggest that clinician-driven cardiac POCUS produces ML model LVEF estimates that correlate well with expert interpretation and echo reported LVEF.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceEchocardiographyHeart failureMachine learningPoint-of-care ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID38539236
PMCPMC10976698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.