ArticleJournal of translational medicine2024
Characterizing and forecasting neoantigens-resulting from MUC mutations in COAD.
Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- MUC16 promotes endometrial cancer progression and modulates sensitivity to lapatinib through the ESR1/PI3K/AKT axis.Translational oncology · 2026Article
- Advanced 3D cancer models for analyzing tumor-immune cell interaction and therapeutic response.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
- Primary mucinous cystadenocarcinoma of the breast: A case report and literature review.Oncology letters · 2025Article
- TRPM6 acts as a prognostic biomarker and mediates MgFrontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe treatment for colon adenocarcinoma (COAD) faces challenges in terms of immunotherapy effectiveness due to multiple factors. Because of the high tumor specificity and immunogenicity, neoantigen has been considered a pivotal target for cancer immunotherapy. Therefore, this study aims to identify and predict the potential tumor antigens of MUC somatic mutations (MUCmut) in COAD.
methodsThree databases of TCGA, TIMER2.0, and cBioPortal were used for a detailed evaluation of the association between MUCmut and multi-factors like tumor mutation burden (TMB), microsatellite instability (MSI), prognosis, and the tumor microenvironment within the context of total 2242 COAD patients. Next, TSNAdb and the differential agretopicity index (DAI) were utilized to predict high-confidence neopeptides for MUCmut based on 531 COAD patients' genomic information. DAI was calculated by subtraction of its predicted HLA binding affinity of the MUCmut peptide from the corresponding wild-type peptide.
resultsThe top six mutation frequencies (14 to 2.9%) were from MUC16, MUC17, MUC5B, MUC2, MUC4 and MUC6. COAD patients with MUC16 and MUC4 mutations had longer DFS and PFS. However, patients with MUC13 and MUC20 mutations had shorter OS. Patients with the mutation of MUC16, MUC5B, MUC2, MUC4, and MUC6 exhibited higher TMB and MSI. Moreover, these mutations from the MUC family were associated with the infiltration of diverse lymphocyte cells and the expression of immune checkpoint genes. Through TSNAdb 1.0/NetMHCpan v2.8, 452 single nucleotide variants (SNVs) of MUCmut peptides were identified. Moreover, through TSNAdb2.0/NetMHCpan v4.0, 57 SNVs, 1 Q-frame shift (TS), and 157 short insertions/deletions (INDELs) of MUCmut were identified. Finally, 10 high-confidence neopeptides of MUCmut were predicted by DAI.
conclusionsTogether, our findings establish the immunogenicity and therapeutic potential of mutant MUC family-derived neoantigens. Through combining the tools of TSNAdb and DAI, a group of novel MUCmut neoantigens were identified as potential targets for immunotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.