ArticleCancer cell international2024
Characterization of the biological and transcriptomic landscapes of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in patients with multiple myeloma.
Article in Cancer cell international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Navigating the Therapeutic Landscape of Multiple Myeloma: Immunotherapy, Microenvironment, and Resistance.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Deregulation of stemness and senescence genes in bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells of multiple myeloma: implications for therapeutic approaches.Blood research · 2026Article
- Article
- Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Reticulated Platelets: New Horizons in Multiple Myeloma.Hematology reports · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) have been acknowledged as the most important stromal cells in the bone marrow (BM) microenvironment for physiologic hematopoiesis and the concomitant hematologic malignancies. However, the systematic and detailed dissection of the biological and transcriptomic signatures of BM-MSCs in multiple myeloma (MM) are largely unknown.
methodsIn this study, we isolated and identified BM-MSCs from 10 primary MM patients and 10 healthy donors (HD). On the one hand, we compared the multifaceted biological characteristics of the indicated two BM-MSCs, including biomarker expression pattern, multilineage differentiation potential, stemness and karyotyping, together with the cellular vitality and immunosuppressive property. On the other hand, we took advantage of RNA-SEQ and bioinformatics analysis to verify the similarities and differences at the transcriptomic level between MM-MSCs and HD-MSCs.
resultsAs to biological phenotypes and biofunctions, MM-MSCs revealed conservation in immunophenotype, stemness and differentiation towards adipocytes and chondrocytes with HD-MSCs, whereas with impaired osteogenic differentiation potential, cellular vitality and immunosuppressive property. As to transcriptomic properties, MM-MSCs revealed multidimensional alterations in gene expression profiling and genetic variations.
conclusionsOverall, our date systematic and detailed reflected the multifaceted similarities and variations between MM-MSCs and HD-MSCs both at the cellular and molecular levels, and in particular, the alterations of immunomodulation and cellular viability of MM-MSCs, which wound benefit the further exploration of the pathogenesis and new drug application (NDA) of multiple myeloma from the view of BM-MSCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.