Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38539127›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2024

Lumbosacral transitional vertebra in spondylolisthesis: frequency, demographic findings, and clinical characteristics.

Mehdi Mahmoodkhani, Arvin Naeimi, Amirhossein Zohrevand, Arian Rabbanifard, Majid Rezvani

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Radiologic Insights: Diagnosing Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebrae. Systematic Review of the Literature.Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mehdi MahmoodkhaniDepartment of Neurosurgery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6903-0839
Arvin NaeimiStudent Research Committee, School of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8659-9549
Amirhossein ZohrevandDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9441-2107
Arian RabbanifardFaculty of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran. rabbanifardarian@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-6700-6719
Majid RezvaniDepartment of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Neurosciences Research Center, Al-Zahra Hospital, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9394-7150
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · IRBabol University of Medical Sciences · IRGuilan University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe association of LSTV with low back pain has been debated in the literature for nearly a century, but the relationship between LSTV and spondylolisthesis is still under discussion. There is currently no valid information about LSTV's prevalence in Iran. This study investigated the relationship between the presence of LSTV and lumbosacral spondylolisthesis regarding frequency, gender and age variation, grade and level of spondylolisthesis, and clinical signs and symptoms.

methodsThis cross-sectional study included spondylolisthesis patients admitted for surgery between March 2021 to December 2022. All patients underwent CT imaging. After evaluating medical records, the baseline data were collected. Patients were categorized into No LSTV, Sacralization, and Lumbarization groups. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the studied groups were compared using an independent T-test and Chi-Square. Multiple logistic regression was used to assess the age and sex variations between groups.

results219 patients with a mean age of 57.07 ± 11.04 were included. A significant relationship was observed between the presence of sacralization and gender diversity with female predominance (P = 0.01). The level of spondylolisthesis and the presence of motor deficits (paresis) significantly differed among study groups (P < 0.05). Sacralization group exhibited a greater prevalence of higher grades of listhesis compared to the other groups.

conclusionsLSTV is frequently seen in spondylolisthesis patients. Sacralization is the common type of LSTV in spondylolisthesis patients, possibly leading to an increased risk for higher grades of vertebral slip and higher rates of motor deficit signs and symptoms. The presence of sacralization results in a significant increase in the incidence of higher levels of spondylolisthesis, especially the L4-L5*(sacralized L5) level. There is no relationship between age and the presence of LSTV in spondylolisthesis.

Indexed as

Spinal DiseasesSpondylolisthesisAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIncidenceLumbar VertebraeMaleMiddle AgedLSTVLumbarizationLumbosacral transitional vertebraeSacralizationSpondylolisthesis

Identifiers

PMID38539127
PMCPMC10967128
OpenAlexW4393226513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.