Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38539107›Full record

ArticleBMC emergency medicine2024

A mapping review of interventions to address patients who frequently seek care in the emergency department.

Ally Memedovich, Benedicta Asante, Maha Khan, Nkiruka Eze, Brian R Holroyd, Eddy Lang, Sherri Kashuba, Fiona Clement

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Frequent users of the ambulance service in a Swedish region: a retrospective cohort study.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ally MemedovichDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Benedicta AsanteDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Maha KhanDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Nkiruka EzeDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Brian R HolroydDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Eddy LangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Sherri KashubaEmergency Strategic Clinical Network™, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Fiona ClementDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada. fclement@ucalgary.ca.
University of Calgary · CAAlberta Health · CAO'Brien Institute · AUUniversity of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe high utilization of acute care services, particularly emergency departments (ED), continues to be a significant concern for healthcare providers. Numerous approaches have been studied to meet the care needs of patients who frequently seek care in the ED; however, there is no comprehensive review of the current literature base. As such, a current understanding of the interventions initiated within the ED to address the needs of frequent users is required. This mapping review had three objectives: identify the characteristics associated with the need to frequently seek care in the ED; identify interventions implemented to address the needs of this population; and identify gaps in the current evidence base.

methodsA knowledge map was created by scoping the literature to identify characteristics associated with frequent ED use and interventions implemented to address frequent use. Then, a literature search was conducted to determine what has been implemented by EDs to reduce frequent ED use. The literature was searched from 2013 to January 2023. MeSH terms and keywords were used to identify relevant studies. Studies implementing an intervention for those with characteristics associated with frequent ED use and reporting on ED use were included.

resultsTwenty-three (23) controlled trials and 35 observational studies were included. The most common populations were older adults, those with chronic conditions, and generic "frequent users". No studies assessed Indigenous Peoples or racial minorities, and few assessed patients with a disability or patients experiencing homelessness. The most common interventions were referrals, care plans, case management, care coordination, and follow-up phone calls. Most studies reported ED revisits, hospitalization, costs, length-of-stay, or outpatient utilization. Few assessed patient or staff perspectives. About one-third of studies (n = 24) reported significant reductions in ED revisits.

conclusionsSimilar interventions, mainly focused on care coordination and planning, have been implemented to address frequent use of the ED. There are still significant gaps in the populations that have been studied. Efforts now must be undertaken to study more diverse populations whose care needs are not being met elsewhere and thus frequent the ED often.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalHospitalizationAgedCase ManagementChronic DiseaseHumansOutpatientsEmergency departmentFrequent usersKnowledge mapMapping review

Identifiers

PMID38539107
PMCPMC10976744
OpenAlexW4393235856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.