Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38538933›Full record

ArticleCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2024

Aha! and D'oh! experiences enhance learning for incidental information-new evidence supports the insight memory advantage.

Carola Salvi, Nicole Keller, Samuel E Cooper, Emily Leiker, Joseph Dunsmoor

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The white matter of Aha! moments.BMC psychology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Carola SalviDepartment of Psychological and Social Sciences, John Cabot University, Rome, Italy. carola.salvi@johncabot.edu.
Nicole KellerDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Samuel E CooperDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Emily LeikerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Joseph DunsmoorDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research on creative problem-solving finds that solutions achieved via spontaneous insight (i.e., Aha! moment) are better remembered than solutions reached without this sense of epiphany, referred to as an "insight memory advantage." We hypothesized that the insight memory advantage can spread to incidental information encoded in the moments surrounding insight as well. Participants (N = 291) were first given Rebus puzzles. After they indicated that they had found a solution, but before they could submit this solution, they were presented with scholastic facts that were incidental and unrelated to the problem at hand. Participants indicated whether they reached the solution via either insight or a step-by-step analysis. Memory results showed better performance for incidental scholastic facts presented when problem solving was accompanied by a spontaneous (Aha! experience) and induced (D'oh! experience) insight compared with solutions reached with analysis. This finding suggests that the memory advantage for problems solved via insight spreads to other unrelated information encoded in close temporal proximity and has implications for novel techniques to enhance learning in educational settings.

Indexed as

LearningProblem SolvingAdolescentAdultCreativityFemaleHumansMaleMemoryYoung AdultAha! momentBehavioral taggingCreativityD’oh! momentInsightLearningMemoryProblem-solving

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.