Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38538844›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Removal of dead fish eggs by Asellus aquaticus as a potential biological control in aquaculture.

Balázs Kucska, Quyến Nguyễn Ngọc, Bence Ivánovics, Ádám Staszny, Máté Havasi, Károly Vranovics, Jeffrey Daniel Griffitts, Ádám Varga, Béla Urbányi, Tamás Müller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Balázs Kucska *Institute of Aquaculture and Environmental Safety, Department of Freshwater Fish Ecology, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Páter Károly U. 1., Gödöllő, 2100, Hungary.
Quyến Nguyễn Ngọc *Institute of Aquaculture and Environmental Safety, Department of Freshwater Fish Ecology, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Páter Károly U. 1., Gödöllő, 2100, Hungary.
Bence Ivánovics *Institute of Aquaculture and Environmental Safety, Department of Environmental Toxicology, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Páter Károly U. 1., Gödöllő, 2100, Hungary. ivanovics.bence@uni-mate.hu.
Ádám StasznyInstitute of Aquaculture and Environmental Safety, Department of Freshwater Fish Ecology, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Páter Károly U. 1., Gödöllő, 2100, Hungary.
Máté HavasiInstitute of Aquaculture and Environmental Safety, Department of Applied Fish Biology, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, 8360, Keszthely, Hungary.
Károly VranovicsInstitute of Aquaculture and Environmental Safety, Department of Freshwater Fish Ecology, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Páter Károly U. 1., Gödöllő, 2100, Hungary.
Jeffrey Daniel GriffittsInstitute of Aquaculture and Environmental Safety, Department of Environmental Toxicology, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Páter Károly U. 1., Gödöllő, 2100, Hungary.
Ádám VargaInstitute of Aquaculture and Environmental Safety, Department of Freshwater Fish Ecology, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Páter Károly U. 1., Gödöllő, 2100, Hungary.
Béla UrbányiInstitute of Aquaculture and Environmental Safety, Department of Aquaculture, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Páter Károly U. 1., Gödöllő, 2100, Hungary. urbanyi.bela@uni-mate.hu.
Tamás MüllerInstitute of Aquaculture and Environmental Safety, Department of Freshwater Fish Ecology, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Páter Károly U. 1., Gödöllő, 2100, Hungary. muller.tamas@uni-mate.hu.

Funding

National Research, Development and Innovation Office NKFI K-135824New National Excellence Program of the Ministry for Culture and Innovation ÚNKP-23-3-I-MATE/22New National Excellence Program of the Ministry for Culture and Innovation ÚNKP-23-4-II-MATE-4
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of the present experimental study was to gain a better understanding of the foraging activity of Asellus aquaticus during fish egg incubation. A. aquaticus were introduced into experimental setups of dead eggs, viable eggs and hatched larvae of zebrafish (Danio rerio), a commonly used model organism. The amount of A. aquaticus and the duration of their exposure to the eggs significantly affected the proportion of consumed dead eggs in each experimental cycle. A. aquaticus belongs to the group of aquatic detritivores, and no predatory behavior was observed during the experiments. These crustaceans could distinguish between the dead eggs and those containing living embryos. Furthermore, zebrafish larvae remained unharmed by A. aquaticus, even in the absence of alternative food source. These findings underscore the potential sanitary role of these crustaceans in natural waters and offer new perspectives on their possible use as biological control organisms in aquaculture hatcheries. Additionally, our results suggest a potential application of A. aquaticus in combating pathogens by reducing the growth substrates for bacteria and fungi.

Indexed as

IsopodaZebrafishAnimalsAquaculture

Identifiers

PMID38538844
PMCPMC10973432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.