ArticleScientific reports2024
Non-invasive perfusion MR imaging of the human brain via breath-holding.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Magnetic resonance imaging of renal oxygenation.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2025Review
- Whole-brain BOLD responses to graded hypoxic challenges at 7 T, 9.4 T, and 15.2 T: Implications for ultrahigh-field functional and dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Problems and solutions in quantifying cerebrovascular reactivity using BOLD-MRI.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MRI plays a pivotal role in the accurate diagnosis and prognosis of several neurovascular diseases, but is limited by its reliance on gadolinium, an intravascularly injected chelated metal. Here, we determined the feasibility of measuring perfusion using a DSC analysis of breath-hold-induced gradient-echo-MRI signal changes. We acquired data at both 3 T and 7 T from ten healthy participants who engaged in eight consecutive breath-holds. By pairing a novel arterial input function strategy with a standard DSC MRI analysis, we measured the cerebral blood volume, flow, and transit delay, and found values to agree with those documented in the literature using gadolinium. We also observed voxel-wise agreement between breath-hold and arterial spin labeling measures of cerebral blood flow. Breath-holding resulted in significantly higher contrast-to-noise (6.2 at 3 T vs. 8.5 at 7 T) and gray matter-to-white matter contrast at higher field strength. Finally, using a simulation framework to assess the effect of dynamic vasodilation on perfusion estimation, we found global perfusion underestimation of 20-40%. For the first time, we have assessed the feasibility of and limitations associated with using breath-holds for perfusion estimation with DSC. We hope that the methods and results presented in this study will help pave the way toward contrast-free perfusion imaging, in both basic and clinical research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.