ArticleScientific reports2024
Detection of biomagnetic signals from induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes using deep learning with simulation data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Machine Learning in Stem Cell Research: From Biological Data to Clinical Translation.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The detection of spontaneous magnetic signals can be used for the non-invasive electrophysiological evaluation of induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (iPS-CMs). We report that deep learning with a dataset that combines magnetic signals estimated using numerical simulation and actual noise data is effective in the detection of weak biomagnetic signals. To verify the feasibility of this method, we measured artificially generated magnetic signals that mimic cellular magnetic fields using a superconducting quantum interference device and attempted peak detection using a long short-term memory network. We correctly detected 80.0% of the peaks and the method achieved superior detection performance compared with conventional methods. Next, we attempted peak detection for magnetic signals measured from mouse iPS-CMs. The number of detected peaks was consistent with the spontaneous beats counted using microscopic observation and the average peak waveform achieved good similarity with the prediction. We also observed the synchronization of peak positions between simultaneously measured field potentials and magnetic signals. Furthermore, the magnetic measurements of cell samples treated with isoproterenol showed potential for the detection of chronotropic effects. These results suggest that the proposed method is effective and has potential application in the safety assessment of regenerative medicine and drug screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.