ArticleScientific reports2024
Automated analysis of knee joint alignment using detailed angular values in long leg radiographs based on deep learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep Learning-Based Full-Process Automatic CPAK Classification System and Its Application in the Analysis of Alignment Outcomes Before and After Knee Arthroplasty.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Research on lung nodule detection in X-ray plain films based on improved YOLOv12 model.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in the biomechanics of knee osteoarthritis: biomechanical phenotyping, risk stratification, diagnosis, treatment and clinical translation-a narrative review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- High agreement of three-dimensional lower limb alignment analysis between a novel cone-beam CT and multislice CT.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
- [Current Landscape and Commercialization of AI Models in Musculoskeletal Imaging].Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2025Review
- An AI-based system for fully automated knee alignment assessment in standard AP knee radiographs.The Knee · 2025Article
- Can Artificial Intelligence Reliably and Accurately Measure Lower Limb Alignment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.The archives of bone and joint surgery · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence in planned orthopaedic care.SICOT-J · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Malalignment in the lower limb structure occurs due to various causes. Accurately evaluating limb alignment in situations where malalignment needs correction is necessary. To create an automated support system to evaluate lower limb alignment by quantifying mechanical tibiofemoral angle (mTFA), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), and joint line convergence angle (JLCA) on full-length weight-bearing radiographs of both lower extremities. In this retrospective study, we analysed 404 radiographs from one hospital for algorithm development and testing and 30 radiographs from another hospital for external validation. The performance of segmentation algorithm was compared to that of manual segmentation using the dice similarity coefficient (DSC). The agreement of alignment parameters was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for internal and external validation. The time taken to load the data and measure the four alignment parameters was recorded. The segmentation algorithm demonstrated excellent agreement with human-annotated segmentation for all anatomical regions (average similarity: 89-97%). Internal validation yielded good to very good agreement for all the alignment parameters (ICC ranges: 0.7213-0.9865). Interobserver correlations between manual and automatic measurements in external validation were good to very good (ICC scores: 0.7126-0.9695). The computer-aided measurement was 3.44 times faster than was the manual measurement. Our deep learning-based automated measurement algorithm accurately quantified lower limb alignment from radiographs and was faster than manual measurement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.