ArticleScientific reports2024
Application of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery with ENDOCRAB system for stomach perforation model: ex vivo porcine study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development of structured fabric-based endoscopic guiding sheath with tunable diameter and stiffness functions.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Iatrogenic stomach perforation is a detrimental, irreversible, and fatal condition. Traditional surgery and endoscopic suturing clips and devices have been introduced to seal holes and prevent sepsis and disease progression. However, the development of endoscopic devices for perforations remains challenging, with no standard device available. This study investigates the superficial layer approximation strengths of the newly designed ENDOCRAB system for gastric wall defects. Thirty porcine stomachs were prepared ex vivo for the perforation model and distributed equally into three groups: ENDOCRAB system, Through-the-Scope Clip (TTSC), and hand suturing (HS). Both ENDOCRAB and TTSC achieved mucosal-submucosal layer apposition, whereas HS allowed a full-thickness layer. Their air leakage pressure and procedural duration were measured. The analysis of air-leakage pressure demonstrated comparable suture strength between ENDOCRAB (118.5 ± 41.7 mmHg) and HS (127.4 ± 30.2 mmHg, P = 0.812), but inferior strength with TTSC (73.6 ± 21.6 mmHg, P = 0.012). HS achieved the shortest procedural duration, whereas ENDOCRAB and TTSC showed no significant differences. The ENDOCRAB system showed significantly greater strength than the TTSC, was comparable to HS in strength, and required a procedural duration similar to that of the TTSC. Furthermore, long-term in vivo experiments and histological evaluations are essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.