Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38537951›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2024

Delirium and incident dementia in hospital patients in New South Wales, Australia: retrospective cohort study.

Emily H Gordon, David D Ward, Hao Xiong, Shlomo Berkovsky, Ruth E Hubbard

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
21.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Emily H GordonCentre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9985-6404
David D WardCentre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5476-9526
Hao XiongCentre for Health Informatics, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6842-1667
Shlomo BerkovskyCentre for Health Informatics, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2638-4121
Ruth E HubbardCentre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8688-5836
The University of Queensland · AUMacquarie University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine the strength and nature of the association between delirium and incident dementia in a population of older adult patients without dementia at baseline.

designRetrospective cohort study using large scale hospital administrative data.

settingPublic and private hospitals in New South Wales, Australia between July 2001 and March 2020.

participantsData were extracted for 650 590 hospital patients aged ≥65 years. Diagnoses of dementia and delirium were identified from ICD-10 (international classification of diseases, 10th revision) codes. Patients with dementia at baseline were excluded. Delirium-no delirium pairs were identified by matching personal and clinical characteristics, and were followed for more than five years.

main outcome measuresCox proportional hazards models and Fine-Gray hazard models were used to estimate the associations of delirium with death and incident dementia, respectively. Delirium-outcome dose-response associations were quantified, all analyses were performed in men and women separately, and sensitivity analyses were conducted.

resultsThe study included 55 211 matched pairs (48% men, mean age 83.4 years, standard deviation 6.5 years). Collectively, 58% (n=63 929) of patients died and 17% (n=19 117) had a newly reported dementia diagnosis during 5.25 years of follow-up. Patients with delirium had 39% higher risk of death (hazard ratio 1.39, 95% confidence interval 1.37 to 1.41) and three times higher risk of incident dementia (subdistribution hazard ratio 3.00, 95% confidence interval 2.91 to 3.10) than patients without delirium. The association with dementia was stronger in men (P=0.004). Each additional episode of delirium was associated with a 20% increased risk of dementia (subdistribution hazard ratio 1.20, 95% confidence interval 1.18 to 1.23).

conclusionsThe study findings suggest delirium was a strong risk factor for death and incident dementia among older adult patients. The data support a causal interpretation of the association between delirium and dementia. The clinical implications of delirium as a potentially modifiable risk factor for dementia are substantial.

Indexed as

DeliriumDementiaAgedAged, 80 and overAustraliaFemaleHospitalsHumansInpatientsMaleNew South WalesRetrospective StudiesRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID38537951
PMCPMC10966895
OpenAlexW4393276462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.