Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38537891›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance imaging2024

A fully Bayesian approach for comprehensive mapping of magnitude and phase brain activation in complex-valued fMRI data.

Zhengxin Wang, Daniel B Rowe, Xinyi Li, D Andrew Brown

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zhengxin WangSchool of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson 29634, SC, USA.
Daniel B RoweDepartment of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, Marquette University, Milwaukee 53233, WI, USA.
Xinyi LiSchool of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson 29634, SC, USA.
D Andrew BrownSchool of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson 29634, SC, USA. Electronic address: ab7@clemson.edu.

Funding

Statistical Methods for Gene Regulatory Analysis From Single Cell Genomics DataP20GM139769 · NIGMS · CLEMSON UNIVERSITY · PI MACKAY, TRUDY F. · 2021 to 2025
$10.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM139769
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) plays a crucial role in neuroimaging, enabling the exploration of brain activity through complex-valued signals. These signals, composed of magnitude and phase, offer a rich source of information for understanding brain functions. Traditional fMRI analyses have largely focused on magnitude information, often overlooking the potential insights offered by phase data. In this paper, we propose a novel fully Bayesian model designed for analyzing single-subject complex-valued fMRI (cv-fMRI) data. Our model, which we refer to as the CV-M&P model, is distinctive in its comprehensive utilization of both magnitude and phase information in fMRI signals, allowing for independent prediction of different types of activation maps. We incorporate Gaussian Markov random fields (GMRFs) to capture spatial correlations within the data, and employ image partitioning and parallel computation to enhance computational efficiency. Our model is rigorously tested through simulation studies, and then applied to a real dataset from a unilateral finger-tapping experiment. The results demonstrate the model's effectiveness in accurately identifying brain regions activated in response to specific tasks, distinguishing between magnitude and phase activation.

Indexed as

BrainMagnetic Resonance ImagingBayes TheoremBrain MappingComputer SimulationGibbs samplingParallel computationPhase analysisRowe–LoganSpike and slab priorVariable selection

Identifiers

PMID38537891
PMCPMC11099946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.