Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38537649›Full record

ReviewThe Gerontologist2024

Advance Care Planning in the Context of Dementia: Defining Concordance.

Jordana L Clayton, Katherine P Supiano, Nancy Aruscavage, Sara G Bybee, Rebecca L Utz, Eli Iacob, Kara B Dassel

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Gerontologist, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jordana L ClaytonGerontology Interdisciplinary Program, College of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-5014-9164
Katherine P SupianoGerontology Interdisciplinary Program, College of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Nancy AruscavageGerontology Interdisciplinary Program, College of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Sara G BybeeGerontology Interdisciplinary Program, College of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5878-6593
Rebecca L UtzGerontology Interdisciplinary Program, College of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7734-7676
Eli IacobGerontology Interdisciplinary Program, College of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Kara B DasselGerontology Interdisciplinary Program, College of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8236-9693
University of Utah · US

Funding

Alzheimer's Association Research AARG-20-685951
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesIndividuals with dementia may require a surrogate decision maker as their disease progresses. To prepare for this potential role, dementia care partners need to develop a thorough understanding of their care recipient's end-of-life values and preferences, or care dyad advance care planning (ACP) concordance. As part of our pilot study implementing the LEAD intervention with dementia care dyads, we conducted a multimethod investigation to define care dyad ACP concordance. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsWe conducted a scoping review of peer-reviewed studies published after 1991 in English focusing on care dyad ACP concordance in dementia care and included 34 articles. Concurrently, we used descriptive qualitative analysis to analyze 7 dyadic ACP conversations from a pilot study about dyadic dementia ACP.

resultsThe scoping review demonstrated (a) no definition of care dyad ACP concordance was reported; (b) surrogate accuracy in end-of-life decisions varies widely; and (c) best practices for ACP in dementia may aid in achieving ACP concordance, but do not prioritize it as an outcome. Qualitative analysis identified 7 elements for achieving concordance: Respect/Regard; use of Clarifying Processes; Conveying Health Care Scenarios; Affirmation of Understanding; Recognizing Uncertainty; Expression of Positive Emotions; and Trust. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Care dyad ACP concordance occurs when care recipients and care partners both understand a care recipient's end-of-life values, understand the end-of-life preferences informed by those values, and the care partner expresses a willingness to accomplish the care recipient's wishes to the best of their ability. ACP concordance can be further operationalized for research and clinical care.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningDementiaAgedCaregiversDecision MakingHumansPilot ProjectsQualitative ResearchTerminal CareDecision makingEnd-of-life careQualitative research methodsSurrogate decision making

Identifiers

PMID38537649
PMCPMC11106733
OpenAlexW4393236322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.