Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38537569›Full record

ArticleBiology of reproduction2024

Quantification of follicles in human ovarian tissue using image processing software and trained artificial intelligence†.

Gabrielle M Blevins, Colleen L Flanagan, Sridula S Kallakuri, Owen M Meyer, Likitha Nimmagadda, James D Hatch, Sydney A Shea, Vasantha Padmanabhan, Ariella Shikanov

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology of reproduction, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gabrielle M BlevinsDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Colleen L FlanaganDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Sridula S KallakuriDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Owen M MeyerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Likitha NimmagaddaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
James D HatchDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Sydney A SheaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Vasantha PadmanabhanDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Ariella ShikanovDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
University of Michigan · US

Funding

Strategic Vision & Impact on Environmental HealthP30ES017885 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Dana Dolinoy · 2011 to 2026
$21.3M
Engineering an immuno-isolating hydrogel for restoring ovarian endocrine functionR01HD104173 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SHIKANOV, ARIELLA · 2021 to 2025
$2.0M
A microphysiological engineered 3D system to the rescue of ovarian folliclesR01HD099402 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SHIKANOV, ARIELLA · 2020 to 2022
$1.1M
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development R01-HD-104173NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD099402NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD104173NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES017885NIH HHS R01HD099402
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer survival rates in prepubertal girls and young women have risen in recent decades due to increasingly efficient treatments. However, many such treatments are gonadotoxic, causing premature ovarian insufficiency, loss of fertility, and ovarian endocrine function. Implantation of donor ovarian tissue encapsulated in immune-isolating capsules is a promising method to restore physiological endocrine function without immunosuppression or risk of reintroducing cancer cells harbored by the tissue. The success of this approach is largely determined by follicle density in the implanted ovarian tissue, which is analyzed manually from histologic sections and necessitates specialized, time-consuming labor. To address this limitation, we developed a fully automated method to quantify follicle density that does not require additional coding. We first analyzed ovarian tissue from 12 human donors between 16 and 37 years old using semi-automated image processing with manual follicle annotation and then trained artificial intelligence program based on follicle identification and object classification. One operator manually analyzed 102 whole slide images from serial histologic sections. Of those, 77 images were assessed by a second manual operator, followed with an automated method utilizing artificial intelligence. Of the 1181 follicles the control operator counted, the comparison operator counted 1178, and the artificial intelligence counted 927 follicles with 80% of those being correctly identified as follicles. The three-stage artificial intelligence pipeline finished 33% faster than manual annotation. Collectively, this report supports the use of artificial intelligence and automation to select tissue donors and grafts with the greatest follicle density to ensure graft longevity for premature ovarian insufficiency treatment.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceImage Processing, Computer-AssistedOvarian FollicleAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansOvarySoftwareYoung Adultartificial intelligencefolliclehuman ovarian tissueimage processingno-codeopen source

Identifiers

PMID38537569
PMCPMC11180617
OpenAlexW4393215761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.