ArticleBiology of reproduction2024
Quantification of follicles in human ovarian tissue using image processing software and trained artificial intelligence†.
Article in Biology of reproduction, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence in ovarian pathophysiology and management: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of ovarian research · 2026Pooled it
- Mapping ovarian cellular and molecular landscape across the lifespan of women: a scoping review.Human reproduction update · 2026Article
- The utility of artificial intelligence and deep learning to automate and accelerate follicle counts in human ovarian tissue†.Biology of reproduction · 2026Article
- Micro-CT and machine learning: a high-throughput alternative to histology for follicle reserve assessment in cryopreserved ovarian tissue.Journal of ovarian research · 2025Article
- Dynamics of YAP localization and transcript activity in human oocytes and granulosa cells across early-stage folliculogenesis: an exploratory investigation.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Article
- OoCount: a machine-learning-based approach to mouse ovarian follicle counting and classification†.Biology of reproduction · 2025Article
- Classification system of human ovarian follicle morphology: recommendations of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development - sponsored ovarian nomenclature workshop.Fertility and sterility · 2025Article
- Digital analysis of ovarian tissue: generating a standardized method of follicle analysis†.Biology of reproduction · 2025Article
- Overview of the Multispecies Ovary Tissue Histology Electronic Repository†.Biology of reproduction · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Cancer survival rates in prepubertal girls and young women have risen in recent decades due to increasingly efficient treatments. However, many such treatments are gonadotoxic, causing premature ovarian insufficiency, loss of fertility, and ovarian endocrine function. Implantation of donor ovarian tissue encapsulated in immune-isolating capsules is a promising method to restore physiological endocrine function without immunosuppression or risk of reintroducing cancer cells harbored by the tissue. The success of this approach is largely determined by follicle density in the implanted ovarian tissue, which is analyzed manually from histologic sections and necessitates specialized, time-consuming labor. To address this limitation, we developed a fully automated method to quantify follicle density that does not require additional coding. We first analyzed ovarian tissue from 12 human donors between 16 and 37 years old using semi-automated image processing with manual follicle annotation and then trained artificial intelligence program based on follicle identification and object classification. One operator manually analyzed 102 whole slide images from serial histologic sections. Of those, 77 images were assessed by a second manual operator, followed with an automated method utilizing artificial intelligence. Of the 1181 follicles the control operator counted, the comparison operator counted 1178, and the artificial intelligence counted 927 follicles with 80% of those being correctly identified as follicles. The three-stage artificial intelligence pipeline finished 33% faster than manual annotation. Collectively, this report supports the use of artificial intelligence and automation to select tissue donors and grafts with the greatest follicle density to ensure graft longevity for premature ovarian insufficiency treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.