ArticleJournal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews2024
Risk Factors for Revision of External Fixation of Unstable Ankle Injuries.
Article in Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Temporising external fixation reduces loss of reduction compared with plaster splinting in ankle fracture-dislocations: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionExternal fixation of unstable ankle injuries is commonly done by orthopaedic surgeons. An improper technique can negate the benefits of the procedure and necessitate revision. This study sought to determine the risk factors for revision of external fixation of unstable ankle injuries.
methodsRetrospective cohort at a level I academic trauma center of 120 consecutive patients underwent external fixation of an unstable ankle injury. Exclusion criteria included external fixation for reason other than fracture, inadequate intraoperative imaging, skeletal immaturity, and follow-up less than 30 days. Primary outcome measurement was revision of external fixation within 30 days.
resultsNinety-seven patients met inclusion criteria. Eighteen (18.6%) underwent revision within 30 days of whom 5 (28%, P < 0.001) had a poor reduction intraoperatively. No patients with a good reduction required revision. Revised patients had a significantly higher talar tilt (P < 0.001) and were more likely to lack a first metatarsal pin (P = 0.018). Multivariate analysis revealed talar tilt >0.5° (odds ratio, 22.62; 95% confidence interval, 6.52 to 50.63) as an independent risk factor for revision. DISCUSSION: For external fixation of unstable ankle injuries, poor reduction quality is a risk factor for need for revision surgery. Orthopaedic surgeons should be critical of their final intraoperative assessment to prevent revision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.